» Articles » PMID: 30547206

Hepatic Steatosis and Reduction in Steatosis Following Bariatric Weight Loss Surgery Differs Between Segments and Lobes

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) distribution across liver segments at baseline and (2) compare longitudinal segmental PDFF changes across time points in adult patients undergoing a very low-calorie diet (VLCD) and subsequent bariatric weight loss surgery (WLS).

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from 118 morbidly obese adult patients enrolled in a VLCD-WLS program. PDFF was estimated using magnitude-based confounder-corrected chemical-shift-encoded (CSE) MRI in each hepatic segment and lobe at baseline (visit 1), after completion of VLCD (visit 2), and at 1, 3, and 6 months (visits 3-5) following WLS. Linear regressions were used to estimate the rate of PDFF change across visits. Lobar and segmental rates of change were compared pairwise.

Results: Baseline PDFF was significantly higher in the right lobe compared to the left lobe (p < 0.0001). Lobar and segmental PDFF declined by 3.9-4.5% per month between visits 1 and 2 (preoperative period) and by 4.3-4.8% per month between visits 1 and 3 (perioperative period), but no significant pairwise differences were found in slope between segments and lobes. For visits 3-5 (postoperative period), lobar and segmental PDFF reduction was much less overall (0.4-0.8% PDFF per month) and several pairwise differences were significant; in each case, a right-lobe segment had greater decline than a left-lobe segment.

Conclusions: Baseline and longitudinal changes in fractional fat content in the 5-month postoperative period following WLS vary across segments, with right-lobe segments having higher PDFF at baseline and more rapid reduction in liver fat content.

Key Points: • Baseline and longitudinal changes in liver fat following bariatric weight loss surgery vary across liver segments. • Methods that do not provide whole liver fat assessment, such as liver biopsy, may be unreliable in monitoring longitudinal changes in liver fat following weight loss interventions.

Citing Articles

MRI-PDFF Assessment of Intrahepatic Fat Changes Post-Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review.

Dejeu D, Dejeu P, Muresan A, Bradea P, Dejeu V Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768883 PMC: 11728038. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122003.


The Impact of Bariatric-Surgery-Induced Weight Loss on Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant: A Focus on Metabolism, Pathophysiological Changes, and Outcome in Obese Patients Suffering NAFLD-Related Cirrhosis.

Sarno G, Schiavo L, Calabrese P, Alvarez Cordova L, Frias-Toral E, Cucalon G J Clin Med. 2022; 11(18).

PMID: 36142939 PMC: 9503676. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185293.


Rectal MRI radiomics inter- and intra-reader reliability: should we worry about that?.

Kwok H, Charbel C, Danilova S, Miranda J, Gangai N, Petkovska I Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022; 47(6):2004-2013.

PMID: 35366088 PMC: 9189624. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03503-7.


Noninvasive estimation of local speed of sound by pulse-echo ultrasound in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver.

Telichko A, Ali R, Brevett T, Wang H, Vilches-Moure J, Kumar S Phys Med Biol. 2021; 67(1).

PMID: 34933288 PMC: 8885567. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4562.


Longitudinal changes on liver proton density fat fraction differ between liver segments.

Syvari J, Junker D, Patzelt L, Kappo K, Al Sadat L, Erfanian S Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021; 11(5):1701-1709.

PMID: 33936958 PMC: 8047351. DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-873.


References
1.
Eguchi Y, Hyogo H, Ono M, Mizuta T, Ono N, Fujimoto K . Prevalence and associated metabolic factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the general population from 2009 to 2010 in Japan: a multicenter large retrospective study. J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47(5):586-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-012-0533-z. View

2.
Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Afendy M, Fang Y, Younossi Y, Mir H . Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States from 1988 to 2008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 9(6):524-530.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.020. View

3.
Yokoo T, Serai S, Pirasteh A, Bashir M, Hamilton G, Hernando D . Linearity, Bias, and Precision of Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements by Using MR Imaging: A Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2017; 286(2):486-498. PMC: 5813433. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170550. View

4.
Reeder S, Hu H, Sirlin C . Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36(5):1011-4. PMC: 4779595. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23741. View

5.
Dixon J, Bhathal P, Hughes N, OBrien P . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Improvement in liver histological analysis with weight loss. Hepatology. 2004; 39(6):1647-54. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20251. View