Ten Myths and Twenty Years: What We Know and What We Still Do Not Know About Work Addiction
Overview
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
This commentary addresses a recent article by Griffiths et al. (2018) about myths in work addiction. In response to the narrative review, I reflect on all the myths that the authors highlighted and the argument on how they tried to counter them. In comparison to an earlier overview by Robinson (1998), it is clear which myths about work addiction are persistent and represent the most important issues about this problem. Most of the myths were countered by the authors, but some of them need more evidence to be unequivocally defeated. The commentary focuses on the most important future research directions based on the myths discussed in this paper.
Work addiction and social functioning: A systematic review and five meta-analyses.
Kenyhercz V, Mervo B, Lehel N, Demetrovics Z, Kun B PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0303563.
PMID: 38833505 PMC: 11149883. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303563.
Rachubinska K, Cybulska A, Kupcewicz E, Panczyk M, Grochans S, Walaszek I Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1305734.
PMID: 38179568 PMC: 10765541. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1305734.
Work addiction and personality: A meta-analytic study.
Kun B, Takacs Z, Richman M, Griffiths M, Demetrovics Z J Behav Addict. 2020; 9(4):945-966.
PMID: 33361486 PMC: 8969726. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2020.00097.
Atroszko P, Demetrovics Z, Griffiths M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(2).
PMID: 31968540 PMC: 7014139. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020660.
Atroszko P, Demetrovics Z, Griffiths M J Behav Addict. 2019; 8(1):7-15.
PMID: 30920291 PMC: 7044606. DOI: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.11.