» Articles » PMID: 30540504

Poor Estimates of Motor Variability Are Associated with Longer Grooved Pegboard Times for Middle-aged and Older Adults

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2018 Dec 13
PMID 30540504
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Goal-directed movements that involve greater motor variability are performed with an increased risk that the intended goal will not be achieved. The ability to estimate motor variability during such actions varies across individuals and influences how people decide to move about their environment. The purpose of our study was to identify the decision-making strategies used by middle-aged and older adults when performing two goal-directed motor tasks and to determine if these strategies were associated with the time to complete the grooved pegboard test. Twenty-one middle-aged (48 ± 6 yr; range 40-59 yr, 15 women) and 20 older adults (73 ± 4 yr; range 65-79 yr, 8 women) performed two targeted tasks, each with two normalized target options. Decision-making characteristics were not associated with time to complete the test of manual dexterity when the analysis included all participants, but slower pegboard times were associated with measures of greater movement variability during the target-directed actions. When the data were clustered on the basis of pegboard time rather than age, relatively longer times for the faster group were associated with greater motor variability during the prescribed tasks, whereas longer times for the slower group were associated with increased risk-seeking behavior (α) and greater variability in the targeted actions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study was the first to examine the association between decision-making choices and an NIH Toolbox test of manual dexterity (grooved pegboard test) performed by middle-aged and older adults. Significant associations were observed between decision-making choices and time to complete the test when the analyses were based on pegboard times rather than chronological age. This result indicates that decision-making choices of middle-aged and older adults, independent of age, were associated with time to complete a test of manual dexterity.

Citing Articles

Hand Grip Force-Time Curve Indicators Evaluated by Dynamometer: A Systematic Review.

Silva-Santos T, Guerra R, Valdiviesso R, Amaral T Nutrients. 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38931305 PMC: 11206825. DOI: 10.3390/nu16121951.


Explaining the influence of practice on the grooved pegboard times of older adults: role of force steadiness.

Daneshgar S, Tvrdy T, Enoka R Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(8):1971-1982.

PMID: 38916760 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06878-9.


Sensory and motor deficits as contributors to early cognitive impairment.

Sayyid Z, Wang H, Cai Y, Gross A, Swenor B, Deal J Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(4):2653-2661.

PMID: 38375574 PMC: 11032563. DOI: 10.1002/alz.13715.


Influence of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on walking kinematics and standing balance of older adults who differ in walking speed.

Alenazy M, Al-Jaafari R, Folkesson-Dey A, Enoka R Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(7):1861-1872.

PMID: 37310476 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06615-8.


Optimizing Fine Motor Coordination, Selective Attention and Reaction Time in Children: Effect of Combined Accuracy Exercises and Visual Art Activities.

Frikha M, Alharbi R Children (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37238334 PMC: 10217286. DOI: 10.3390/children10050786.


References
1.
Wang Y, Magasi S, Bohannon R, Reuben D, McCreath H, Bubela D . Assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox. J Hand Ther. 2011; 24(4):313-20. PMC: 3783205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.05.001. View

2.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

3.
Tymula A, Rosenberg Belmaker L, Ruderman L, Glimcher P, Levy I . Like cognitive function, decision making across the life span shows profound age-related changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(42):17143-8. PMC: 3801020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309909110. View

4.
Falconer K, Winter D . Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985; 25(2-3):135-49. View

5.
Farina D, Negro F . Common synaptic input to motor neurons, motor unit synchronization, and force control. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014; 43(1):23-33. DOI: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000032. View