» Articles » PMID: 30534984

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Patient Survival and Health-related Quality of Life

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Our goal was to study the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock who were treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), including the subsequent long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 133 consecutive patients treated in a single centre from 2007 to 2016. The HRQoL was studied using the EuroQuol-5 dimensions-3 level questionnaire and the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey at a minimum of 1 year after VA ECMO.

Results: Of all patients, 66 (49.6%) were weaned from VA ECMO and 16 (12.0%) patients were bridged directly to a transplant, 15 (11.3%) to a ventricular assist device and 1 (0.8%) to a total artificial heart. Survival to discharge was 63.9% and to 1 year, 60.9%. A higher in-hospital mortality rate was independently associated with lower HCO3 at VA ECMO implantation [odds ratio (OR) 1.2/decrease of 1 mmol/l in HCO3 (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.3, P < 0.001)] and with increased need of red blood cells transfused during intensive care [OR 1.9/unit of red blood cells needed/day (95% confidence interval 1.4-2.6, P  < 0.001)]. HRQoL measured with the EuroQuol-5 dimensions-3 level questionnaire was equal to the HRQoL of the general population. In the 36-Item Short Form questionnaire, patients reported better emotional well-being and equal energy, pain and general health perception compared to the general population. Limitations were experienced only in physical health. In total, 56% of the patients ≤ 60 years had returned to work.

Conclusions: VA ECMO can provide acceptable long-term survival with good HRQoL for selected patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Timing of patient assessment and of VA ECMO implantation is essential because deeper acidosis is associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate.

Citing Articles

Anticoagulation and associated complications in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vlok R, Buscher H, Delaney A, Garside T, McDonald G, Chatoor R Crit Care Resusc. 2025; 26(4):332-363.

PMID: 39781486 PMC: 11704180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.10.003.


Cost-Utility of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: A Brazilian Perspective Study.

da Rosa Decker S, Wainstein R, Scolari F, Rosa P, Schneider D, Fogazzi D Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024; 121(8):e20230672.

PMID: 39194041 PMC: 11463338. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20230672.


Sounding the Alarm: What Clinicians Need to Know about Physical, Emotional, and Cognitive Recovery After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Higa K, Mayer K, Quinn C, Jubina L, Suarez-Pierre A, Colborn K Crit Care Med. 2023; 51(9):1234-1245.

PMID: 37163480 PMC: 11210608. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005900.


Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life in Non-Surgical Adult Patients Supported with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Oxygenation.

Cankar T, Krepek M, Kosmopoulos M, Radsel P, Yannopoulos D, Noc M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36362678 PMC: 9658568. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216452.


Clinical observation of different targeted temperature management methods in patients with cardiac arrest.

Huang H, Wang Y, Wang R, Cai J, Wang W, Zhang X Am J Transl Res. 2022; 14(4):2436-2442.

PMID: 35559368 PMC: 9091101.