» Articles » PMID: 30533008

Sex-specific Dominance Reversal of Genetic Variation for Fitness

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Dec 12
PMID 30533008
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The maintenance of genetic variance in fitness represents one of the most longstanding enigmas in evolutionary biology. Sexually antagonistic (SA) selection may contribute substantially to maintaining genetic variance in fitness by maintaining alternative alleles with opposite fitness effects in the two sexes. This is especially likely if such SA loci exhibit sex-specific dominance reversal (SSDR)-wherein the allele that benefits a given sex is also dominant in that sex-which would generate balancing selection and maintain stable SA polymorphisms for fitness. However, direct empirical tests of SSDR for fitness are currently lacking. Here, we performed a full diallel cross among isogenic strains derived from a natural population of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus that is known to exhibit SA genetic variance in fitness. We measured sex-specific competitive lifetime reproductive success (i.e., fitness) in >500 sex-by-genotype F1 combinations and found that segregating genetic variation in fitness exhibited pronounced contributions from dominance variance and sex-specific dominance variance. A closer inspection of the nature of dominance variance revealed that the fixed allelic variation captured within each strain tended to be dominant in one sex but recessive in the other, revealing genome-wide SSDR for SA polymorphisms underlying fitness. Our findings suggest that SA balancing selection could play an underappreciated role in maintaining fitness variance in natural populations.

Citing Articles

The adaptive value of recombination in resolving intralocus sexual conflict by gene duplication.

Harper J, Morrow E Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20242629.

PMID: 39837526 PMC: 11750403. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2629.


Sex-Specific Dominance of Gene Expression in Seed Beetles.

Kaufmann P, Ronn J, Immonen E, Arnqvist G Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(12).

PMID: 39692633 PMC: 11653567. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae244.


Cis-regulatory Variation in Relation to Sex and Sexual Dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Mishra P, Barrera T, Grieshop K, Agrawal A Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39613311 PMC: 11606641. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae234.


Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy.

Zhang J Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2024; 54:1-19.

PMID: 39473988 PMC: 11521367. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-022323-083451.


The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic.

Cole J, Scott C, Johnson M, Golightly P, Carlson J, Ming M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(39):e2412315121.

PMID: 39302970 PMC: 11441502. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2412315121.


References
1.
Connallon T, Clark A . Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model. Genetics. 2014; 197(3):991-1006. PMC: 4096376. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.165605. View

2.
Zajitschek F, Connallon T . Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness. Evolution. 2018; 72(6):1306-1316. DOI: 10.1111/evo.13493. View

3.
Rice W . SEX CHROMOSOMES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM. Evolution. 2017; 38(4):735-742. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00346.x. View

4.
Dobzhansky T . A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955; 20:1-15. DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.003. View

5.
Mank J . Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 18(12):721-730. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.83. View