Use of Otoacoustic Emissions to Improve Outcomes and Reduce Disparities in a Community Preschool Hearing Screening Program

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2018 Dec 12

PMID 30532159

Authors

Elizabeth Cedars

Hayley Kriss

Ann A Lazar

Curtis Chan

Dylan K Chan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Hearing loss substantially impacts pediatric development, and early identification improves outcomes. While intervening before school-entry is critical to optimize learning, early-childhood hearing screening practices are highly variable. Conditioned play audiometry (CPA) is the gold standard for preschool hearing screening, but otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing provides objective data that may improve screening outcomes.

Objectives: To compare outcomes of a community-based low-income preschool hearing program before and after implementation of OAE in a single-visit, two-tiered paradigm. We hypothesized that this intervention would reduce referral rates and improve follow-up while maintaining stable rates of diagnosed sensorineural hearing loss.

Methods: We performed a cohort study of 3257 children screened from July 2014-June 2016. Department of Public Health data were analyzed pre- and post-implementation of second-line OAE testing for children referred on CPA screening with targeted follow-up by DPH staff. Primary outcomes included referral rates, follow-up rates, and diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss.

Results: Demographics, pure-tone pass rates, and incidence of newly-diagnosed permanent hearing loss were similar across years. After intervention, overall pass rates increased from 92% to 95% (P = 0.0014), while only 0.7% remained unable to be tested (P<0.0001). 5% of children were unable to be tested by CPA screening but passed OAE testing, obviating further evaluation. Referral rate decreased from 8% to 5% (P = 0.0014), and follow-up improved from 36% to 91% (P<0.0001). Identification of pathology in children with follow-up increased from 19% to over 50%. Further, disparities in pass rates and ability to test seen in Year 1 were eliminated in Year 2.

Conclusion And Relevance: In a community setting, implementation of second-line OAE screening for CPA referrals reduced referral rates, increased identification of hearing loss, reduced outcome disparities, and improved follow-up rates. This study provides lessons in how to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in early-childhood hearing screening.

References

Sideris I, Glattke T . A comparison of two methods of hearing screening in the preschool population. J Commun Disord. 2006; 39(6):391-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.11.006. View

Shargorodsky J, Curhan S, Curhan G, Eavey R . Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. JAMA. 2010; 304(7):772-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1124. View

Williams T, Alam S, Gaffney M . Progress in identifying infants with hearing loss—United States, 2006-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64(13):351-6. PMC: 4584626. View

Cunningham S, Ruben J, Narayan K . Health of foreign-born people in the United States: a review. Health Place. 2008; 14(4):623-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.12.002. View

Bamford J, Fortnum H, Bristow K, Smith J, Vamvakas G, Davies L . Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(32):1-168, iii-iv. DOI: 10.3310/hta11320. View

Mehra S, Eavey R, Keamy Jr D . The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: newborns, children, and adolescents. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140(4):461-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.022. View

Bess F, Parker R . Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear. 1998; 19(5):339-54. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199810000-00001. View

. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(4):898-921. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333. View

Niskar A, Kieszak S, Holmes A, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody D . Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 1998; 279(14):1071-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.14.1071. View

10.

Eiserman W, Hartel D, Shisler L, Buhrmann J, White K, Foust T . Using otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 72(4):475-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.12.006. View

11.

Watkin P, Baldwin M . Identifying deafness in early childhood: requirements after the newborn hearing screen. Arch Dis Child. 2010; 96(1):62-6. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.185819. View

12.

Yoshinaga-Itano C . Benefits of early intervention for children with hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999; 32(6):1089-102. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70196-1. View

13.

Prieve B, Schooling T, Venediktov R, Franceschini N . An Evidence-Based Systematic Review on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hearing Screening Instruments for Preschool- and School-Age Children. Am J Audiol. 2015; 24(2):250-67. DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0065. View