» Articles » PMID: 30529899

Contrast Enhancement is a Prognostic Factor in IDH1/2 Mutant, but Not in Wild-type WHO Grade II/III Glioma As Confirmed by Machine Learning

Overview
Journal Eur J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Dec 12
PMID 30529899
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mutation of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene and co-deletion on chromosome 1p/19q is becoming increasingly relevant for the evaluation of clinical outcome in glioma. Among the imaging parameters, contrast enhancement (CE) in WHO II/III glioma has been reported to indicate poor outcome in the past. We aimed at reassessing the prognostic value of CE in these tumours within the framework of molecular markers using a machine learning approach (random survival forests [RSF]) as well as conventional Cox regression modelling.

Methods: 301 patients with WHO grade II (n = 181) or grade III glioma (n = 120) were stratified according to their molecular profile. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed and volumetric analyses of CE and T volumes were performed followed by conventional univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Furthermore, the dataset was split into discovery and validation datasets, and RSFs were trained on the discovery dataset to predict the individual risk of each patient. Concordance indices for Cox and RSF models were determined and the variable importance of explanatory variables was assessed using the minimal-depth concept.

Results: In IDH mut tumours only, both conventional Cox regression modelling and RSF analyses showed that CE on initial MRI is a prognostic factor for survival with dependence on volume (p < 0.05). In contrast, presence of CE on initial MRI was not associated with outcome in IDH wt tumours.

Conclusions: In patients with diffuse IDH wt gliomas WHO grade II/III, CE is not associated with survival, whereas in tumours with an IDH mutation, presence of CE on initial MRI is linked to inferior survival.

Citing Articles

Expanded Use of Vorasidenib in Non-Enhancing Recurrent CNS WHO Grade 3 Oligodendroglioma.

Himstead A, Chen J, Chu E, Perez-Rosendahl M, Zheng M, Mathew S Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857783 PMC: 11762706. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010201.


Prognostic and clinical significance of contrast enhancement in WHO grade 2 oligodendrogliomas.

Zhao X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ren X, Zhang X, Wan H J Neurooncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39827421 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04929-3.


Determinants of long-term survival in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas.

Katzendobler S, Niedermeyer S, Blobner J, Trumm C, Harter P, von Baumgarten L J Neurooncol. 2024; 170(3):655-664.

PMID: 39316316 PMC: 11614945. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04826-9.


Long-term outcomes of CNS WHO grade 2 oligodendroglioma in adult patients: a single-institution experience.

Byeon Y, Lee C, Jeon J, Kim G, Chong S, Kim Y Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):268.

PMID: 38971940 PMC: 11227491. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01136-4.


The biological significance of tumor grade, age, enhancement, and extent of resection in IDH-mutant gliomas: How should they inform treatment decisions in the era of IDH inhibitors?.

van den Bent M, French P, Brat D, Tonn J, Touat M, Ellingson B Neuro Oncol. 2024; 26(10):1805-1822.

PMID: 38912846 PMC: 11449017. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae107.