Continuous Support During Labour in Childbirth: a Cross-Sectional Study in a University Teaching Hospital in Shanghai, China

Overview

Journal BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2018 Dec 8

PMID 30522458

Citations 10

Authors

Man Wang

Qing Song

Jun Xu

Zheng Hu

Yingying Gong

Arier C Lee

Qi Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Fear or anxiety could result in adverse consequences on the course of labour. To date, family members are still not permitted in the delivery rooms in the majority of hospitals in China, and continuous support from hospital professional staff is also limited. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of continuous support by family members and hospital professional staff during labour in China.

Methods: In this Cross-Sectional study, 362 primiparous pregnancies who self-requested to receive continuous or one to one support with vaginal delivery and 362 primiparous pregnant women with routine hospital maternal care were included from a university teaching hospital. Data on the length of labour, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), use of pain relief, use of oxytocin, fetal distress, emergency caesarean section and apgar score at 1 and 5 min were retrospectively collected from hospital medical data-base and compared between the two groups.

Results: Multiple linear regressions adjusting for maternal age, BMI and birth weight, revealed the estimated length of labour for women with routine hospital maternal care was 2.03 times (95%CI 1.86 to 2.21) the duration of women with supportive care (median time, 3.05 h vs 1.5 h). In addition, Fisher's exact test showed the emergency caesarean section rate was significantly lower in women with supportive care compared to women with routine hospital maternal care (3.3% vs 24%).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that continuous support from family members together with hospital professional staff should be considered as part of intrapartum care in hospitals in China.

Citing Articles

Expanding Labor Support Education to Nurses Caring for Women in Labor.

Viera-Martinez A, Rosenblum R, Aberbook V J Perinat Educ. 2024; 33(3):103-112.

PMID: 39399146 PMC: 11467712. DOI: 10.1891/JPE-2023-0019.

Effects of the online and offline hybrid continuous group care on maternal and infant health: a randomized controlled trial.

Yang X, Li L, Zhou R, Xia J, Li M, Zhang C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):629.

PMID: 37658338 PMC: 10472587. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05882-1.

Dene, métis and inuvialuit peoples' voices on the impact of Canada's perinatal transport and non-medical escort policy in their communities: an outcome assessment approach and narrative literature review.

Eggenberger L, Cruz S, Moffitt P Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022; 81(1):2149061.

PMID: 36420931 PMC: 9704071. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2149061.

Use and Effects of Augmentation of Labor with Oxytocin: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Case-Control Study of 4350 Women in Warsaw, Poland, 2015-2020.

Baczek G, Rychlewicz S, Budner M, Kowalska I, Galazkowski R, Teliga-Czajkowska J Med Sci Monit. 2022; 28:e937557.

PMID: 35982582 PMC: 9397144. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937557.

Two are better than one? The impact of lay birth companions on childbirth experiences and PTSD.

Handelzalts J, Levy S, Ayers S, Krissi H, Peled Y Arch Womens Ment Health. 2022; 25(4):797-805.

PMID: 35697941 PMC: 9191546. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-022-01243-7.

References

Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S . Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; (4):CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2. View

Hodnett E, Gates S, Hofmeyr G, Sakala C . Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7:CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5. View

McGrath S, Kennell J . A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008; 35(2):92-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00221.x. View

Ryding E, Wijma B, Wijma K, Rydhstrom H . Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998; 77(5):542-7. View

Liston W, Campbell A . Dangers of oxytocin-induced labour to fetuses. Br Med J. 1974; 3(5931):606-7. PMC: 1611603. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.3.5931.606. View

Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A . Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):265. PMC: 5577840. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1447-9. View

Gao L, Liu X, Fu B, Xie W . Predictors of childbirth fear among pregnant Chinese women: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Midwifery. 2015; 31(9):865-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.05.003. View

Lunda P, Minnie C, Benade P . Women's experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):167. PMC: 5952857. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8. View

Khresheh R . Support in the first stage of labour from a female relative: the first step in improving the quality of maternity services. Midwifery. 2009; 26(6):e21-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.003. View

10.

Greenberg M, Cheng Y, Hopkins L, Stotland N, Bryant A, Caughey A . Are there ethnic differences in the length of labor?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195(3):743-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.016. View

11.

Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M . Partner experiences of "near-miss" events in pregnancy and childbirth in the UK: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e91735. PMC: 3981658. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091735. View

12.

Chauhan S, Magann E, Scott J, Scardo J, Hendrix N, Martin Jr J . Cesarean delivery for fetal distress: rate and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003; 58(5):337-50. DOI: 10.1097/01.OGX.0000066802.19138.AE. View

13.

Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding E . Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88(7):807-13. DOI: 10.1080/00016340902998436. View

14.

Li H, Luo S, Trasande L, Hellerstein S, Kang C, Li J . Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2014. JAMA. 2016; 317(1):69-76. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.18663. View

15.

Kashanian M, Javadi F, Haghighi M . Effect of continuous support during labor on duration of labor and rate of cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 109(3):198-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.028. View

16.

Bohren M, Hofmeyr G, Sakala C, Fukuzawa R, Cuthbert A . Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 7:CD003766. PMC: 6483123. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. View

17.

Kringeland T, Daltveit A, Moller A . What characterizes women in Norway who wish to have a caesarean section?. Scand J Public Health. 2009; 37(4):364-71. DOI: 10.1177/1403494809105027. View

18.

Johnson R, Slade P . Does fear of childbirth during pregnancy predict emergency caesarean section?. BJOG. 2002; 109(11):1213-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.01351.x. View

19.

Wang X, Hellerstein S, Hou L, Zou L, Ruan Y, Zhang W . Caesarean deliveries in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1):54. PMC: 5294866. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1233-8. View

20.

Elvander C, Cnattingius S, Kjerulff K . Birth experience in women with low, intermediate or high levels of fear: findings from the first baby study. Birth. 2013; 40(4):289-96. PMC: 3868996. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12065. View