» Articles » PMID: 30521566

Citizen Social Lab: A Digital Platform for Human Behavior Experimentation Within a Citizen Science Framework

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Dec 7
PMID 30521566
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cooperation is one of the behavioral traits that define human beings, however we are still trying to understand why humans cooperate. Behavioral experiments have been largely conducted to shed light into the mechanisms behind cooperation-and other behavioral traits. However, most of these experiments have been conducted in laboratories with highly controlled experimental protocols but with limitations in terms of subject pool or decisions' context, which limits the reproducibility and the generalization of the results obtained. In an attempt to overcome these limitations, some experimental approaches have moved human behavior experimentation from laboratories to public spaces, where behaviors occur naturally, and have opened the participation to the general public within the citizen science framework. Given the open nature of these environments, it is critical to establish the appropriate data collection protocols to maintain the same data quality that one can obtain in the laboratories. In this article we introduce Citizen Social Lab, a software platform designed to be used in the wild using citizen science practices. The platform allows researchers to collect data in a more realistic context while maintaining the scientific rigor, and it is structured in a modular and scalable way so it can also be easily adapted for online or brick-and-mortar experimental laboratories. Following citizen science guidelines, the platform is designed to motivate a more general population into participation, but also to promote engaging and learning of the scientific research process. We also review the main results of the experiments performed using the platform up to now, and the set of games that each experiment includes. Finally, we evaluate some properties of the platform, such as the heterogeneity of the samples of the experiments, the satisfaction level of participants, or the technical parameters that demonstrate the robustness of the platform and the quality of the data collected.

Citing Articles

Is there a role for citizen science in death and dying research?.

Wilkinson C, Llewellyn A, McCabe C Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1241239.

PMID: 37794893 PMC: 10546016. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1241239.


A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention.

Marks L, Laird Y, Trevena H, Smith B, Rowbotham S Front Public Health. 2022; 10:743348.

PMID: 35615030 PMC: 9125037. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.743348.


Citizen science at public libraries: Data on librarians and users perceptions of participating in a citizen science project in Catalunya, Spain.

Cigarini A, Bonhoure I, Vicens J, Perello J Data Brief. 2022; 40:107713.

PMID: 35005128 PMC: 8717417. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107713.


Gender-based pairings influence cooperative expectations and behaviours.

Cigarini A, Vicens J, Perello J Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1041.

PMID: 31974477 PMC: 6978365. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57749-6.


Resource heterogeneity leads to unjust effort distribution in climate change mitigation.

Vicens J, Bueno-Guerra N, Gutierrez-Roig M, Gracia-Lazaro C, Gomez-Gardenes J, Perello J PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0204369.

PMID: 30379845 PMC: 6209147. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204369.

References
1.
. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015; 349(6251):aac4716. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716. View

2.
Mann A . Core Concepts: Computational social science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(3):468-70. PMC: 4725526. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524881113. View

3.
Bonney R, Shirk J, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Ballard H, Miller-Rushing A . Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Science. 2014; 343(6178):1436-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554. View

4.
Shirado H, Christakis N . Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experiments. Nature. 2017; 545(7654):370-374. PMC: 5912653. DOI: 10.1038/nature22332. View

5.
Cigarini A, Vicens J, Duch J, Sanchez A, Perello J . Quantitative account of social interactions in a mental health care ecosystem: cooperation, trust and collective action. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):3794. PMC: 5830605. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21900-1. View