» Articles » PMID: 30516925

Microdissection is the Best Way to Perform Sperm Retrieval in Men with Non-obstructive Azoospermy? | Opinion: Yes

Overview
Journal Int Braz J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2018 Dec 6
PMID 30516925
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

Microdissection TESE versus conventional TESE for men with nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing sperm retrieval.

Esteves S Int Braz J Urol. 2022; 48(3):569-578.

PMID: 35333489 PMC: 9060172. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.99.14.

References
1.
Su L, Palermo G, Goldstein M, Veeck L, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel P . Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval. J Urol. 1999; 161(1):112-6. View

2.
Schlegel P . Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(1):131-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.131. View

3.
Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W . Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(3):653-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.653. View

4.
Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, Hara I, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S . Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002; 168(3):1063-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64575-2. View

5.
Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Tohda A, Miura H, Nishimura K . Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(11):2924-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2924. View