» Articles » PMID: 30506852

Duration of Exposure to Antipseudomonal β-Lactam Antibiotics in the Critically Ill and Development of New Resistance

Overview
Journal Pharmacotherapy
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2018 Dec 4
PMID 30506852
Citations 75
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objective: Minimizing the duration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure in the critically ill is a commonly used strategy aimed at preventing resistance. Our objective was to correlate the duration of exposure to antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics with the development of new resistance in critically ill patients.

Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A large, academic, tertiary care hospital.

Patients: A total of 7118 adults with a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who received at least one dose of cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam during their hospitalization between 2010 and 2015.

Measurements And Main Results: Cohort entry was defined as the first day of any antipseudomonal β-lactam initiation, and exposure was defined as the cumulative days of any antipseudomonal β-lactam exposure during the 60-day follow-up period. The primary outcome was development of new resistance to any antipseudomonal β-lactam > 3 days after cohort entry. New resistance was defined as detection of resistance to any antipseudomonal β-lactam not identified within 180 days before cohort entry. Patients without an outcome (i.e., did not develop new resistance) or who died by day 60 were censored. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to assess the risk of development of new resistance to any antipseudomonal β-lactam with each additional day of exposure. Analyses of each individual antipseudomonal β-lactam were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Each additional day of exposure to any antipseudomonal β-lactam resulted in an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.05) for new resistance development. The risk of developing new resistance to cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam for each additional day of exposure resulted in an aHR of 1.08 (95% CI 1.07-1.09), 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03), and 1.08 (95% CI 1.06-1.09), respectively.

Conclusion: Among critically ill patients who receive antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics, each additional day of exposure to cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with an increased risk of new resistance development.

Citing Articles

Study on the diagnostic role of exosome-derived miRNAs in postoperative septic shock and non-septic shock patients.

Garcia-Concejo A, Sanchez-Quiros B, Gomez-Sanchez E, Sanchez-de Prada L, Tamayo-Velasco A, Tovar-Doncel M Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):96.

PMID: 40033446 PMC: 11874436. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05320-y.


Single-center observational analysis of a pharmacist-driven antibiotic time-out targeting antipseudomonal drugs.

Diaz C, Margulis Landayan A, Porras Jr L, Samsundar S, Murillo J, Gauthier T Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025; 5(1):e48.

PMID: 40026769 PMC: 11869067. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2025.6.


Observational study of antibiotic prescribing patterns by age and sex in primary care in England: why we need to take this variation into account to evaluate antibiotic stewardship and predict AMR variation.

Waterlow N, Ashfield T, Knight G JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025; 7(1):dlae210.

PMID: 39927312 PMC: 11803082. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae210.


Clinical Outcomes of Early Phenotype-Desirable Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterobacterales Bacteremia.

Moon R, MacVane S, David J, Morton J, Rosenthal N, Claeys K JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(12):e2451633.

PMID: 39714841 PMC: 11667351. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51633.


Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications for Food Safety and Public Health.

Ifedinezi O, Nnaji N, Anumudu C, Ekwueme C, Uhegwu C, Ihenetu F Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596781 PMC: 11591122. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13111087.


References
1.
Kalil A, Metersky M, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney D, Palmer L . Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 63(5):e61-e111. PMC: 4981759. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. View

2.
Munoz-Price L, Frencken J, Tarima S, Bonten M . Handling Time-dependent Variables: Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 62(12):1558-1563. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw191. View

3.
Singh N, Rogers P, Atwood C, Wagener M, Yu V . Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 162(2 Pt 1):505-11. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9909095. View

4.
Dennesen P, van der Ven A, Kessels A, Ramsay G, Bonten M . Resolution of infectious parameters after antimicrobial therapy in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 163(6):1371-5. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.2007020. View

5.
Barlam T, Cosgrove S, Abbo L, MacDougall C, Schuetz A, Septimus E . Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 62(10):e51-77. PMC: 5006285. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw118. View