» Articles » PMID: 30506495

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Two Darbepoetin Alfa Formulations in Healthy Male Volunteers

Overview
Journal BioDrugs
Date 2018 Dec 4
PMID 30506495
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety properties of the test (CJ-40001) and reference (NESP) versions of darbepoetin alfa following a single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration in healthy male subjects.

Methods: A single-blind, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-intervention crossover study was conducted, with two separate parts consisting of SC or IV administration. In each period, either a test or reference product was administered via the SC or IV route. Serial blood samples for PK analysis and the reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red blood cell counts for PD analysis were collected for up to 360 or 264 h after SC or IV administration, respectively. The PK and PD parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD parameters between the two interventions were estimated. Safety and anti-drug antibody profile assessments were performed.

Results: The mean darbepoetin alfa concentration-time profiles were comparable between the two products for SC and IV administration. Additionally, the PD and safety profiles were similar between the two products. Anti-drug antibody reactivity was negative for all samples from both intervention groups for SC and IV administration. The time-matched serum darbepoetin alfa concentration and the PD markers presented a counter-clockwise hysteresis, which suggests a time delay between the exposure and response.

Conclusion: The test and reference darbepoetin alfa formulations had similar PK, PD, and safety profiles. Thus, it is expected that the two formulations are able to be used interchangeably in clinical settings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03542916.

Citing Articles

Quantitative systems pharmacology model of erythropoiesis to simulate therapies targeting anemia due to chronic kidney disease.

Roy M, Saroha S, Sarma U, Sarathy H, Kumar R Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1274490.

PMID: 38125882 PMC: 10731587. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1274490.


Comparison of Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Tolerability Profiles of CKD-11101, Darbepoetin Alfa (NESP) Biosimilar, to Those of NESP After a Single Subcutaneous or Intravenous Administration to Healthy Subjects.

Jeon I, Oh J, Kwon Y, Yoon S, Cho J, Jang I Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021; 15:1735-1747.

PMID: 33953543 PMC: 8089108. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S303772.

References
1.
Macdougall I, Gray S, Elston O, Breen C, Jenkins B, Browne J . Pharmacokinetics of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein compared with epoetin alfa in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10(11):2392-5. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V10112392. View

2.
Egrie J, Browne J . Development and characterization of novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein (NESP). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001; 16 Suppl 3:3-13. View

3.
Joy M . Darbepoetin alfa: a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein. Ann Pharmacother. 2002; 36(7-8):1183-92. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1A416. View

4.
Macdougall I . Optimizing the use of erythropoietic agents-- pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002; 17 Suppl 5:66-70. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/17.suppl_5.66. View

5.
Vansteenkiste J, Pirker R, Massuti B, Barata F, Font A, Fiegl M . Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94(16):1211-20. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1211. View