» Articles » PMID: 30505939

Conceptualizing and Measuring Mental Illness Stigma: The Mental Illness Stigma Framework and Critical Review of Measures

Overview
Journal Stigma Health
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Dec 4
PMID 30505939
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the last decade has seen a proliferation of research on mental illness stigma, lack of consistency and clarity in both the conceptualization and measurement of mental illness stigma has limited the accumulation of scientific knowledge about mental illness stigma and its consequences. In the present article, we bring together the different foci of mental illness stigma research with the . The MISF provides a common framework and set of terminology for understanding mechanisms of mental illness stigma that are relevant to the study of both the stigmatized and the stigmatizer. We then apply this framework to systematically review and classify stigma measures used in the past decade according to their corresponding stigma mechanisms. We identified more than 400 measures of mental illness stigma, two thirds of which had not undergone any systematic psychometric evaluation. Stereotypes and discrimination received the most research attention, while mechanisms that focus on the perspective of individuals with mental illness (e.g., experienced, anticipated, or internalized stigma) have been the least studied. Finally, we use the MISF to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of mental illness stigma measurement, identify gaps in the literature, and provide recommendations for future research.

Citing Articles

Occupational Heat Exposure & Mental Health Outcomes: A Review and Framework Incorporating Social Determinants of Health to Guide Future Research.

Florez-Acevedo S, Blancas M, Spector J Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025; 12(1):15.

PMID: 40014259 DOI: 10.1007/s40572-025-00479-6.


Experienced and anticipated discrimination among people living with schizophrenia in China: a cross-sectional study.

Li Y, Qiu D, Zhang C, Wu Q, Ni A, Tang Z Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39953168 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-025-02839-x.


Relationships between structural stigma, societal stigma, and minority stress among gender minority people.

Clark K, Lunn M, Sevelius J, Dawson-Rose C, Weiss S, Neilands T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2996.

PMID: 39848993 PMC: 11757992. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-85013-8.


Magnitude and correlates of internalised stigma among outpatient psychiatric service users in southeast central Ethiopia.

Abraham T, Kabeta T, Gezahegn Y BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):18.

PMID: 39762821 PMC: 11705680. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06453-0.


Social distancing mediates clinical work and depression: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses.

Chen S, Lee T, Chao E Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1437766.

PMID: 39651476 PMC: 11620995. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437766.


References
1.
van der Heijden A, Bijl J, Latour C, Hoekstra H, van Meijel B . Student nurses' perceptions of mental health care: validation of a questionnaire. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 32(4):373-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.013. View

2.
Link B, Cullen F . Contact with the mentally ill and perceptions of how dangerous they are. J Health Soc Behav. 1986; 27(4):289-302. View

3.
Eack S, Newhill C . An Investigation of the Relations Between Student Knowledge, Personal Contact, and Attitudes Toward Individuals with Schizophrenia. J Soc Work Educ. 2013; 44(3). PMC: 3864827. DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700009. View

4.
Quinn D, Earnshaw V . Concealable Stigmatized Identities and Psychological Well-Being. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2013; 7(1):40-51. PMC: 3664915. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12005. View

5.
Williams D, Neighbors H, Jackson J . Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(2):200-8. PMC: 1447717. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.200. View