» Articles » PMID: 30498273

Cochlear Implantation in Far-advanced Otosclerosis: Hearing Results and Complications

Overview
Date 2018 Dec 1
PMID 30498273
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Severe forms of otosclerosis known as far-advanced otosclerosis (FAO) can lead to severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and can justify cochlear implantation. Because of the pathophysiology of otosclerosis, patients implanted for FAO may experience an increased rate of complications, such as facial nerve stimulation or electrode dislocation, and may have poorer hearing outcomes than expected. This retrospective study aimed to compare cochlear implantation hearing outcomes, surgical difficulties and complications in FAO patients versus non-FAO patients. Moreover, we evaluated whether high resolution computed tomography (CT scan) findings were predictive of perioperative problems, complications and hearing outcomes. FAO patients were diagnosed based on medical history, examination and CT scan. Thirty-five ears from FAO patients were compared to 38 control ears. Audiometric results were assessed at least 12 months after implantation by pure tone average, speech reception threshold, monosyllabic and disyllabic word recognition score (WRS) and Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) sentences test. Complications and surgical difficulties were compiled. CT scan findings were categorised within 3 grades of otosclerotic extension. No significant difference was found between FAO and non-FAO hearing outcomes, except that monosyllabic WRS were lower for FAO patients, especially those who underwent previous stapedotomy. Facial nerve symptomatology occurred in 8.6% of FAO patients; among these, one required explantation-reimplantation surgery. 86% of FAO implanted patients had retrofenestral extension on CT. These were associated with poorer disyllabic WRS (51% 68%, p < 0.05) than those with only fenestral involvement. Although not significant, high grade of severity on CT tended to be associated with surgical difficulties and complications. Cochlear implantation in FAO patients is an effective treatment technique. Though the overall complication rate is low, it tends to be higher in cases of severe extension on CT. Patient counselling should be adjusted accordingly.

Citing Articles

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence.

Tsuji R, Hamerschmidt R, Lavinsky J, Felix F, Silva V Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(1):101512.

PMID: 39442262 PMC: 11539123. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101512.


Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Far-Advanced Otosclerosis Who Had Previously Undergone Stapes Surgery.

Skarzynski P, Pastuszak A, Gos E, Lorens A, Kolodziejak A, Obrycka A J Int Adv Otol. 2024; 20(2):101-107.

PMID: 39155792 PMC: 11114151. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2024.231332.


Facial nerve stimulation in adult cochlear implant recipients with far advanced otosclerosis.

Tuset M, Baptiste A, Cyna Gorse F, Sterkers O, Nguyen Y, Lahlou G Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023; 8(1):220-229.

PMID: 36846428 PMC: 9948588. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.984.


OTOPLAN, Cochlear Implant, and Far-Advanced Otosclerosis: Could the Use of Software Improve the Surgical Final Indication?.

Ricci G, Lapenna R, Gambacorta V, Volpe A, Faralli M, Stadio A J Int Adv Otol. 2022; 18(1):74-78.

PMID: 35193850 PMC: 9449992. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2022.21329.


Histopathologic Analysis of Temporal Bones With Otosclerosis Following Cochlear Implantation.

Hodge S, Ishiyama G, Lopez I, Ishiyama A Otol Neurotol. 2021; 42(10):1492-1498.

PMID: 34607995 PMC: 8595606. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003327.


References
1.
Ruckenstein M, Rafter K, Montes M, Bigelow D . Management of far advanced otosclerosis in the era of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2001; 22(4):471-4. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200107000-00010. View

2.
HOUSE H, Sheehy J . Stapes surgery: selection of the patient. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1961; 70:1062-8. DOI: 10.1177/000348946107000411. View

3.
Rotteveel L, Proops D, Ramsden R, Saeed S, van Olphen A, Mylanus E . Cochlear implantation in 53 patients with otosclerosis: demographics, computed tomographic scanning, surgery, and complications. Otol Neurotol. 2004; 25(6):943-52. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00014. View

4.
Marshall A, Fanning N, Symons S, Shipp D, Chen J, Nedzelski J . Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(10):1728-33. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000171052.34196.ef. View

5.
Polak M, Ulubil S, Hodges A, Balkany T . Revision cochlear implantation for facial nerve stimulation in otosclerosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 132(4):398-404. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.4.398. View