Self-affirmation Enhances the Processing of Uncertainty: An Event-related Potential Study

Overview

Journal Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci

Publisher Springer

Specialties Neurology
Social Sciences

Date 2018 Nov 30

PMID 30488229

Citations 3

Authors

Ruolei Gu

Jing Yang

Ziyan Yang

Zihang Huang

Mingzheng Wu

Huajian Cai

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We proposed that self-affirmation can endow people with more cognitive resource to cope with uncertainty. We tested this possibility with an event-related potential (ERP) study by examining how self-affirmation influences ambiguous feedback processing in a simple gambling task, which was used to investigate risk decision-making. We assigned 48 participants randomly to the affirmation and non-affirmation (i.e., control) groups. All participants accepted the manipulation first and then completed the gambling task with an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, in which participants might receive a positive (winning), negative (losing), or ambiguous (unknown valence) outcome after they made a choice. We considered both the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3 components elicited by the outcome feedback, which reflected the amount of cognitive resources being invested in the early and late stages of the outcome feedback processing, respectively. ERP results showed that ambiguous feedback elicited a larger FRN among affirmed participants than unaffirmed participants but exerted no influence on the P3. This finding suggests that self-affirmation may help coping with uncertainty by enhancing the early processing of uncertainty.

Citing Articles

Neural responses to decision-making in suicide attempters with youth major depressive disorder.

Bao C, Zhang Q, He C, Zou H, Xia Y, Yan R Neuroimage Clin. 2024; 43:103667.

PMID: 39241548 PMC: 11406072. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103667.

Effectiveness of Self-Affirmation Interventions in Educational Settings: A Meta-Analysis.

Escobar-Soler C, Berrios R, Penaloza-Diaz G, Melis-Rivera C, Caqueo-Urizar A, Ponce-Correa F Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38200909 PMC: 10779329. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010003.

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) as an Optimal Treatment for Schizophrenia Risk Decision: an ERSP Study.

Wu Y, Wang L, Yu F, Ji G, Xiao G, Feifei X Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:594102.

PMID: 34040546 PMC: 8143028. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.594102.

References

Cohen J, Polich J . On the number of trials needed for P300. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997; 25(3):249-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00743-x. View

Polich J . Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(10):2128-48. PMC: 2715154. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. View

Luck S, Gaspelin N . How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't). Psychophysiology. 2016; 54(1):146-157. PMC: 5178877. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12639. View

Kahneman D, Tversky A . Variants of uncertainty. Cognition. 1982; 11(2):143-57. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90023-3. View

Cascio C, Brook ODonnell M, Tinney F, Lieberman M, Taylor S, Strecher V . Self-affirmation activates brain systems associated with self-related processing and reward and is reinforced by future orientation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015; 11(4):621-9. PMC: 4814782. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv136. View

Philiastides M, Biele G, Vavatzanidis N, Kazzer P, Heekeren H . Temporal dynamics of prediction error processing during reward-based decision making. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(1):221-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.052. View

Smith B, Mitchell D, Hardin M, Jazbec S, Fridberg D, Blair R . Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(2):600-9. PMC: 2695942. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.016. View

Holroyd C, Coles M . The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev. 2002; 109(4):679-709. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679. View

Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E . Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science. 1977; 197(4305):792-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.887923. View

10.

Bland A, Schaefer A . Different varieties of uncertainty in human decision-making. Front Neurosci. 2012; 6:85. PMC: 3370661. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00085. View

11.

Gibbons H, Schnuerch R, Stahl J . From Positivity to Negativity Bias: Ambiguity Affects the Neurophysiological Signatures of Feedback Processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 28(4):542-57. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00921. View

12.

Granholm E, Verney S, Perivoliotis D, Miura T . Effortful cognitive resource allocation and negative symptom severity in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 33(3):831-42. PMC: 2526135. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbl040. View

13.

Gu R, Feng X, Broster L, Yuan L, Xu P, Luo Y . Valence and magnitude ambiguity in feedback processing. Brain Behav. 2017; 7(5):e00672. PMC: 5434181. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.672. View

14.

Gu R, Lei Z, Broster L, Wu T, Jiang Y, Luo Y . Beyond valence and magnitude: a flexible evaluative coding system in the brain. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(14):3891-7. PMC: 3665265. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.006. View

15.

Lust S, Bartholow B . Self-reported and P3 event-related potential evaluations of condoms: does what we say match how we feel?. Psychophysiology. 2009; 46(2):420-4. PMC: 4692251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00775.x. View

16.

Polezzi D, Sartori G, Rumiati R, Vidotto G, Daum I . Brain correlates of risky decision-making. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(2):1886-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.068. View

17.

Hajcak G, Moser J, Holroyd C, Simons R . The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol. 2005; 71(2):148-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001. View

18.

Webb C, Auerbach R, Bondy E, Stanton C, Foti D, Pizzagalli D . Abnormal neural responses to feedback in depressed adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016; 126(1):19-31. PMC: 5215965. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000228. View

19.

Legault L, Al-Khindi T, Inzlicht M . Preserving integrity in the face of performance threat: self-affirmation enhances neurophysiological responsiveness to errors. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(12):1455-60. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612448483. View

20.

Marco-Pallares J, Cucurell D, Munte T, Strien N, Rodriguez-Fornells A . On the number of trials needed for a stable feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology. 2010; 48(6):852-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01152.x. View