» Articles » PMID: 30486605

Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Factors Among Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Thai Women with Invasive Breast Cancer: 15 Years Follow-up Data

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Nov 30
PMID 30486605
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background and Purpose: This study focused on molecular subtypes and prognostic factors for survival of preand post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 523 patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast treated at Ubon Ratchathani Cancer Hospital,Thailand from 2002 to 2016. Patient characteristics were collected based on a systematic chart audit from medical records. Prognostic factors were performed by observe survival analysis. A Cox regression model was used to calculate hazard ratios of death, taking into account the age and menopause status, molecular subtype, stage of disease, histological grade, lymphatic and vascular invasion, resection margin, hormone receptor expression, and treatment modality. Results: The median time from the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer to the last follow-up or death was 10.2 [95% CI = 9.28-11.95] years in premenopausal women, and 7.4 [95% CI = 6.48-8.44] years in postmenopausal cases. The overall survival estimates at 5 and 10 years for younger woman of 71.2% and 51.8% respectively, appeared slightly better than the 68.3% and 40.9% for postmenopausal women [HRadj = 1.27, 95% CI =0.99-1.63]. In the multivariate analysis, 3 prognostic indicators significantly predicted a worse overall survival in premenopausal patients, triple negative subtype [HRadj = 6.03, 95% CI = 1.94-18.74], HER2-enriched status [HRadj = 4.11, 95% CI = 1.59-10.65] and stage III [HRadj = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.10-6.79]. Statistically significant increased risk of death in postmenopausal patients was noted for only chemotherapy after mastectomy [HRadj = 8.76, 95% CI = 2.88-26.61], and for a Luminal B status [HRadj = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.47-8.53]. Conclusion: Postmenopausal women with invasive breast cancer experience a significantly shorter survival than do their premenopausal counterparts. The predictors of worse overall survival were molecular subtype, stage of disease and type of treatment administered.

Citing Articles

Omission of axillary surgery in cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment.

Kwon Y, Lim J, Ha B, Kim S, Park J, Lim Y Gland Surg. 2024; 13(8):1408-1417.

PMID: 39282037 PMC: 11399007. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-146.


Intercontinental Comparison of Immunohistochemical Subtypes Among Individuals With Breast Cancer in South-East Asia and South America: A Scoping Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Hermansyah D, Firsty N, Siagian R, Dwinda N World J Oncol. 2024; 15(3):355-371.

PMID: 38751698 PMC: 11092420. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1788.


Molecular subtypes as a prognostic breast cancer factor in women users of the São Paulo public health system, Brazil.

Peres S, Arantes P, Fagundes M, AbSaber A, Gimenes D, Curado M Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2023; 26:e230028.

PMID: 37255208 PMC: 10229073. DOI: 10.1590/1980-549720230028.


Obesity and menopausal status impact the features and molecular phenotype of invasive lobular breast cancer.

Rothschild H, Abel M, Patterson A, Goodman K, Shui A, Van Baelen K Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 191(2):451-458.

PMID: 34817747 PMC: 8763723. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06453-8.


Clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics: predictions using global textural features of the ipsilateral breast mammogram.

Kanbayti I, Rae W, McEntee M, Gandomkar Z, Ekpo E Radiol Phys Technol. 2021; 14(3):248-261.

PMID: 34076829 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-021-00622-6.


References
1.
Hartley M, McKinley B, Rogers E, Kalbaugh C, Messich H, Blackhurst D . Differential expression of prognostic factors and effect on survival in young (< or =40) breast cancer patients: a case-control study. Am Surg. 2007; 72(12):1189-94. View

2.
Yang X, Sherman M, Rimm D, Lissowska J, Brinton L, Peplonska B . Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(3):439-43. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0806. View

3.
Bauer K, Brown M, Cress R, Parise C, Caggiano V . Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007; 109(9):1721-8. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22618. View

4.
Beadle B, Woodward W, Tucker S, Outlaw E, Allen P, Oh J . Ten-year recurrence rates in young women with breast cancer by locoregional treatment approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 73(3):734-44. PMC: 3041273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.078. View

5.
Gnerlich J, Deshpande A, Jeffe D, Sweet A, White N, Margenthaler J . Elevated breast cancer mortality in women younger than age 40 years compared with older women is attributed to poorer survival in early-stage disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208(3):341-7. PMC: 3262236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.001. View