» Articles » PMID: 30485939

Socio-Environmental Patterns Associated with Cancer Mortality: A Study Based on a Quality of Life Approach

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Nov 30
PMID 30485939
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With 18.6% of total deaths due to malignant tumors in 2016, cancer is the second leading death cause in Argentina. While there is a broad consensus on common risk factors at the individual cancer level, those operating at a contextual level have been poorly studied in developing countries. The objective of our study was to identify socio-environmental patterns in Argentina (2010), emphasizing quality of life, and to explore their associations with the spatial distribution of cancer mortality in the country. Methods: The study was conducted in 525 geographical divisions nested into 24 provinces. Sex-specific crude and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) for cancer (2009-2011 period) were calculated. Empirically derived socio-environmental patterns were identified through principal-component factor analysis on a selected set of variables: an urban scale and 29 indicators of a quality of life index in Argentina for 2010. Two-level Poisson regression models were used to estimate associations between the ASMR and the continuous factor scores for socio-environmental patterns as covariates. A random intercept was included to account for spatial variability in the ASMR distribution using Stata software. Results: Four socio-environmental patterns were identified, termed “Contexts with urban-related resources or cultural capital”, “Socioeconomically prosperous contexts”, “Environments with anthropic exposures” and “Plains region” (cumulative explained variance=57%). High mortality rates were found in counties characterized by socioeconomically prosperous contexts (RR=1.025 in women; 1.088 in men) and plain landscapes (RR=1.057 and 1.117, respectively). Counties featuring urban or cultural resources demonstrated increased mortality in women (RR=1.015, 95%CI=1.005-1.025), whereas rising rates associated with environments having anthropic exposures (RR=1.008, 95%CI=1.001-1.016) were observed only for men. Conclusion: This study identified four characteristic socio-environmental patterns in Argentina which incorporate features of quality of life, accounting to some extent for the differential burden of cancer mortality in this country.

Citing Articles

Sociodemographic disparities and contextual factors in obesity: updated evidence from a National Survey of Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases.

Pou S, Diaz M, Velazquez G, Aballay L Public Health Nutr. 2021; :1-13.

PMID: 34924081 PMC: 9991557. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021004924.

References
1.
Lagiou P, Adami H, Trichopoulos D . Causality in cancer epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005; 20(7):565-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-005-7968-y. View

2.
Woods L, Rachet B, Coleman M . Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol. 2005; 17(1):5-19. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj007. View

3.
Hiatt R, Breen N . The social determinants of cancer: a challenge for transdisciplinary science. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl):S141-50. PMC: 10773976. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.006. View

4.
Arrossi S, Ramos S, Paolino M, Sankaranarayanan R . Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16(32):50-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)32410-0. View

5.
Diaz M, Osella A, Aballay L, Munoz S, Lantieri M, Butinof M . Cancer incidence pattern in Cordoba, Argentina. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2009; 18(4):259-66. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283152030. View