» Articles » PMID: 30483411

Is the Single Self-rated Health Item Reliable in India? A Construct Validity Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Glob Health
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Nov 29
PMID 30483411
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In high-income countries, the self-rated health (SRH) item is used in health surveys to capture the population's general health because of its simplicity and satisfactory validity and reliability. Despite scepticism about its use in low-income and middle-income countries, India implemented the SRH item in many of its demographic and population health surveys, but evidence of its validity is lacking. The objective was to assess the construct validity of the SRH item in India.

Methods: Data for 4492 men and 4736 women from the Indian sample of the World Health Survey (2003) were used. Overall, 43 health status indicators were grouped into health dimensions (physical, mental and functional health, chronic diseases, health behaviours) and the SRH item was regressed on these indicators by using sex-stratified multivariable linear regressions, adjusted with demographic and socioeconomic variables.

Results: Respondents (participation rate 95.6%; mean age 38.9 years) rated their health as very good (21.8%), good (36.4%), moderate (26.6%), bad (13.2%) or very bad (2.0%). Among men, the adjusted explained SRH variance by health dimensions ranged between 18% and 41% (physical 33%, mental 32%, functional health 41%, chronic diseases 23%, health behaviours 18%). In multivariable models, the overall explained variance increased to 45%. The 43 health status indicators were associated with SRH and their effect sizes were in the expected direction. Among women, results were similar (overall explained variance 48%).

Conclusion: The SRH item has satisfactory construct validity and may be used to monitor health status in demographic and population health surveys of India.

Citing Articles

Improving health outcomes among older adults in India: effectiveness and implementability of a novel comprehensive geriatric assessment based intervention.

Kshatri J, Shenkin S, Mercer S, Weller D, Palo S, Pati S Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 8:414.

PMID: 39554375 PMC: 11564926. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19796.3.


Social transition, socioeconomic status and self-rated health in China: evidence from a national cross-sectional survey (CGSS).

Gao Y, Zeng J, Liao Z, Yang J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1359609.

PMID: 38903586 PMC: 11187279. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359609.


An individually adjusted approach for communicating epidemiological results on health and lifestyle to patients.

Waaler P, Bongo L, Rolandsen C, Lorem G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3199.

PMID: 38331938 PMC: 10853548. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53275-x.


The role of family support in the self-rated health of older adults in eastern Nepal: findings from a cross-sectional study.

Shrestha A, Ghimire S, Kinney J, Mehta R, Mistry S, Saito S BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):20.

PMID: 38178009 PMC: 10768249. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04619-1.


Correlates of poor self-rated health among school-going adolescent girls in urban Varanasi, India.

Patel R, Bansod D BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1921.

PMID: 37794345 PMC: 10552224. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16822-1.


References
1.
Manderbacka K, Lundberg O . Examining points of reference of self-rated health among Swedish oldest old. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1996; 23(1):47-60. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4943(96)00707-8. View

2.
DeSalvo K, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P . Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 21(3):267-75. PMC: 1828094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00291.x. View

3.
Pu C, Tang G, Fang Y, Chou Y . Which domain of self-rated health best predicts medical care utilization among Taiwanese adults?. J Epidemiol. 2012; 22(5):417-24. PMC: 3798636. DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20110144. View

4.
Bago dUva T, van Doorslaer E, Lindeboom M, ODonnell O . Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities?. Health Econ. 2007; 17(3):351-75. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1269. View

5.
Cox B, Van Oyen H, Cambois E, Jagger C, le Roy S, Robine J . The reliability of the Minimum European Health Module. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(2):55-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-7104-y. View