» Articles » PMID: 30482879

Patterns and Trends in OSHA Occupational Noise Exposure Measurements from 1979 to 2013

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 29
PMID 30482879
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Noise is one of the most common exposures, and occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is highly prevalent. In addition to NIHL, noise is linked to numerous non-auditory health effects. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) database of compliance-related measurements performed in various industries across the USA. The goal of the current study was to describe and analyse personal noise measurements available through the OSHA IMIS, identifying industries with elevated personal noise levels or increasing trends in worker exposure over time.

Methods: Through a Freedom of Information Act request, we obtained OSHA's noise measurements collected and stored in IMIS between 1979 and 2013 and analysed permissible exposure limit (PEL) and action level (AL) criteria measurements by two-digit industry code.

Results: The manufacturing industry represented 87.8% of the 93 920 PEL measurements and 84.6% of the 58 073 AL measurements. The highest mean noise levels were found among the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry for PEL (93.1 dBA) and the mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction group for AL (93.3 dBA). Overall, measurements generally showed a decreasing trend in noise levels and exceedances of AL and PEL by year, although this was not true for all industries.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that, despite reductions in noise over time, further noise control interventions are warranted both inside and outside of the manufacturing industry. Further reductions in occupational noise exposures across many industries are necessary to continue to reduce the risk of occupational NIHL.

Citing Articles

Noise exposure, hearing loss and cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study based on an occupational health surveillance cohort in China.

Huang L, Li L, Wang J, Zhang S, Wu H, Lan Y Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1455340.

PMID: 40046130 PMC: 11880209. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455340.


Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Noise-Exposed US Workers Within the Utilities Sector, 2010-2019.

Masterson E, Themann C J Occup Environ Med. 2024; 66(8):648-653.

PMID: 38664951 PMC: 11683764. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003125.


Prerequisite for Imputing Non-detects among Airborne Samples in OSHA's IMIS Databank: Prediction of Sample's Volume.

Burstyn I, Sarazin P, Luta G, Friesen M, Kincl L, Lavoue J Ann Work Expo Health. 2023; 67(6):744-757.

PMID: 36975192 PMC: 10324645. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxad017.


Development and initial validation of the Chinese Version of the Noise Exposure Questionnaire (C-NEQ).

Han K, Wang Q, Yang L, Xu S, Li C, Lin J BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):207.

PMID: 35100992 PMC: 8805437. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12648-5.


Global, regional, and national burden of age-related hearing loss from 1990 to 2019.

Man J, Chen H, Zhang T, Yin X, Yang X, Lu M Aging (Albany NY). 2021; 13(24):25944-25959.

PMID: 34910687 PMC: 8751586. DOI: 10.18632/aging.203782.


References
1.
Roberts B, Sun K, Neitzel R . What can 35 years and over 700,000 measurements tell us about noise exposure in the mining industry?. Int J Audiol. 2016; 56(sup1):4-12. PMC: 5712437. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1255358. View

2.
Virkkunen H, Kauppinen T, Tenkanen L . Long-term effect of occupational noise on the risk of coronary heart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005; 31(4):291-9. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.885. View

3.
Neitzel R, Swinburn T, Hammer M, Eisenberg D . Economic Impact of Hearing Loss and Reduction of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the United States. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60(1):182-189. DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0365. View

4.
Dobie R . Economic compensation for hearing loss. Occup Med. 1995; 10(3):663-8. View

5.
Leon Bluhm G, Berglind N, Nordling E, Rosenlund M . Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occup Environ Med. 2006; 64(2):122-6. PMC: 2078434. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2005.025866. View