Negligible Risk of Acute Renal Failure Among Hospitalized Patients After Contrast-Enhanced Imaging With Iodinated Versus Gadolinium-Based Agents

Introduction: The potential adverse renal outcome among patients undergoing iodine-based contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) has been questioned recently, given the caution undertaken in patients' selection, hydration protocols, and the low radiocontrast volume, used with advanced imaging equipment.

Materials And Methods: This study is a retrospective assessment of renal outcome in 12,580 hospitalized patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT, compared with 754 patients subjected to gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging, with subsequent propensity matching for clinical characteristics and potential risk factors.

Results: The risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) was found to be negligible as compared with patients undergoing enhanced magnetic resonance imaging studies, before and after propensity matching (8% vs 7.3% rate of AKI in the nonmatched iodine-based contrast agents [IBCAs] and gadolinium-based contrast agents [GBCAs], respectively, P = 0.3, and 7% in the matched IBCA group, P = 0.9), including comparisons among subgroups with well-defined risk factors such as chronic renal failure, diabetes, older age, and hypertension. However, lower systolic blood pressure before imaging was associated with higher risk to develop PC-AKI after IBCA administration but not with GBCA (for systolic blood pressure lower than 110 mm Hg, odds ratio for AKI after IBCA was 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.88, and after GBCA; odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.73).

Conclusions: With the current precautions undertaken, the real-life risk of PC-AKI among inpatients undergoing CT is insignificant. Possible reasons for the diverse impact of blood pressure on the propensity to develop acute kidney failure after iodine-based but not gadolinium-based enhancement imaging are discussed.