» Articles » PMID: 30479581

Feasibility of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy to Treat Gastric Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Nov 28
PMID 30479581
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To present a proposed gastric cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning protocol for an institution that have not introduced volumetric modulated arc therapy in clinical practice. A secondary aim was to determine the impact of 2DkV set-up corrections on target coverage and organ at risk (OAR).

Methods And Materials: Twenty consecutive patients were treated with a specially-designed non-coplanar 7-field IMRT technique. The isocenter-shift method was used to estimate the impact of 2DkV-based set-up corrections on the original base plan (BP) coverage. An alternative plan was simulated (SP) by taking into account isocenter shifts. The SP and BP were compared using dose-volume histogram (DVH) plots calculated for the internal target volume (ITV) and OARs.

Results: Both plans delivered a similar mean dose to the ITV (100.32 vs. 100.40%), with no significant differences between the plans in internal target coverage (5.37 vs. 4.96%). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the maximal dose to the spinal cord (67.70 and 67.09%, respectively) and volume received 50% of the prescribed dose of: the liver (62.11 vs. 59.84%), the right (17.62 vs. 18.58%) and left kidney (29.40 vs. 30.48%). Set-up margins (SM) were computed as 7.80 mm, 10.17 mm and 6.71 mm in the left-right, cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusion: Presented IMRT protocol (OAR dose constraints with selected SM verified by 2DkV verification) for stomach treatment provided optimal dose distribution for the target and the critical organs. Comparison of DVH for the base and the modified plan (which considered set-up uncertainties) showed no significant differences.

References
1.
Strbac B, Jokic V . Evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging. Phys Med. 2013; 29(5):531-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.12.001. View

2.
Isobe K, Uno T, Kawakami H, Ueno N, Kawata T, Ito H . A case of gastric lymphoma with marked interfractional gastric movement during radiation therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2006; 11(2):159-61. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-005-0557-y. View

3.
Macdonald J, Smalley S, Benedetti J, Hundahl S, Estes N, STEMMERMANN G . Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(10):725-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010187. View

4.
Boda-Heggemann J, Hofheinz R, Weiss C, Mennemeyer P, Mai S, Hermes P . Combined adjuvant radiochemotherapy with IMRT/XELOX improves outcome with low renal toxicity in gastric cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(4):1187-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.036. View

5.
Leszczynski W, Polanowski P, Leszczynska P, Hawrylewicz L, Braclik I, Kawczynski R . Can we obtain planning goals for conformal techniques in neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric cancer patients?. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016; 21(3):149-55. PMC: 5002022. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.008. View