» Articles » PMID: 30479403

Perceived Message Effectiveness Meets the Requirements of a Reliable, Valid, and Efficient Measure of Persuasiveness

Overview
Journal J Commun
Date 2018 Nov 28
PMID 30479403
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

Exploring perceived learning effectiveness in virtual reality health communication through the lens of construal level theory.

Liao C BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2348.

PMID: 39210293 PMC: 11360774. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19827-6.


Towards AI-Driven Healthcare: Systematic Optimization, Linguistic Analysis, and Clinicians' Evaluation of Large Language Models for Smoking Cessation Interventions.

Calle P, Shao R, Liu Y, Hebert E, Kendzor D, Neil J Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024; 2024.

PMID: 38912297 PMC: 11192205. DOI: 10.1145/3613904.3641965.


How Do Behavioral Framing, Linguistic Certainty, and Target Specification Impact Responses to Vaping Prevention Messages?.

Ma H, Collins M, Ritchie C, Galper E, Sheeran P, Sutfin E J Health Commun. 2024; 29(7):420-431.

PMID: 38767865 PMC: 11421031. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2024.2355299.


Achieving Public Health Impact: Health Communication Research to Inform Tobacco Regulatory Science.

Noar S, Jang Y, Nguyen Zarndt A, Zhao X, Ross J, Cappella J Health Commun. 2024; 39(14):3545-3552.

PMID: 38478963 PMC: 11393175. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2326250.


The doctor knows or the evidence shows: An online survey experiment testing the effects of source trust, pro-vaccine evidence, and dual-processing in expert messages recommending child COVID-19 vaccination to parents.

Kikut A PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288272.

PMID: 37478116 PMC: 10361505. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288272.


References
1.
Bigsby E, Cappella J, Seitz H . Efficiently and Effectively Evaluating Public Service Announcements: Additional Evidence for the Utility of Perceived Effectiveness. Commun Monogr. 2015; 80(1):1-23. PMC: 4283792. DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2012.739706. View

2.
Morgan J, Sutton J, Yang S, Cappella J . Impact of Graphic Warning Messages on Intentions to Use Alternate Tobacco Products. J Health Commun. 2020; 25(8):613-623. PMC: 8262429. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1827097. View

3.
Lee S, Cappella J . Distraction Effects of Smoking Cues in Antismoking Messages: Examining Resource Allocation to Message Processing as a Function of Smoking Cues and Argument Strength. Media Psychol. 2014; 16(2):154-176. PMC: 4250969. DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2012.755454. View

4.
Falcone M, Jepson C, Sanborn P, Cappella J, Lerman C, Strasser A . Association of BDNF and COMT genotypes with cognitive processing of anti-smoking PSAs. Genes Brain Behav. 2011; 10(8):862-7. PMC: 4000094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00726.x. View

5.
Strasser A, Cappella J, Jepson C, Fishbein M, Tang K, Han E . Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(3):293-302. PMC: 2666374. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntn026. View