» Articles » PMID: 30478686

Early Laparoscopic Washout May Resolve Persistent Intra-abdominal Infection Post-appendicectomy

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Nov 28
PMID 30478686
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) complicates 2-3% of patients having an appendicectomy. The usual management is prolonged antibiotics and drainage of the IAA. From 2006, our unit chose to use early re-laparoscopy and washout in patients with persistent sepsis following appendicectomy. The aims of this study were to assess the outcomes of early laparoscopic washout in patients with features of persistent intra-abdominal sepsis and compare those with percutaneous drainage and open drainage of post-appendicectomy IAA.

Methods: A retrospective case note review was performed for all patients having a laparoscopic washout, percutaneous drainage or open drainage following appendicectomy between January 2006 and December 2017.

Results: During the period, 4901 appendicectomies occurred. Forty-one (0.8%) patients had a laparoscopic washout, 16 (0.3%) had percutaneous drainage, and 6 (0.1%) had an open drainage. The demographics, ASA grade and pathology at initial appendicectomy were similar. The mean time after appendicectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopic washout (4.1 days vs. 10.1 and 9.0 days, p = <0.003). The mean time for resolution of SIRS was significantly shorter (2.0 days vs. 3.3 and 5.2 days, p <0.02). The morbidity and length of stay were similar.

Conclusion: Early laparoscopic washout for persistent intra-abdominal sepsis may be an alternative to non-operative management and delayed intervention for IAA and may have better outcomes than either percutaneous drainage or open drainage. A prospective randomised comparison is required to further evaluate the indications and role of early laparoscopic washout post-appendicectomy.

Citing Articles

Management of Inflammatory Phlegmon in Appendicitis: Comparing the Role of Emergency vs. Interval Appendectomy at a Single Institution.

Liew A, Tomar A, Rajagopalan A, Tan R, Chen M, Tay Y Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73801.

PMID: 39687806 PMC: 11648038. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73801.


Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Quah G, Eslick G, Cox M Surg Endosc. 2019; 33(7):2072-2082.

PMID: 30868324 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06746-6.

References
1.
van Ruler O, Mahler C, Boer K, Reuland E, Gooszen H, Opmeer B . Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007; 298(8):865-72. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.8.865. View

2.
Heloury Y, Baron M, Bourgoin S, WETZEL O, Lejus C, Plattner V . Medical treatment of postappendectomy intraperitoneal abscesses in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1995; 5(3):149-51. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1066191. View

3.
Okoye B, Rampersad B, Marantos A, Abernethy L, Losty P, Lloyd D . Abscess after appendicectomy in children: the role of conservative management. Br J Surg. 1998; 85(8):1111-3. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00782.x. View

4.
Mulier S, Penninckx F, Verwaest C, Filez L, Aerts R, Fieuws S . Factors affecting mortality in generalized postoperative peritonitis: multivariate analysis in 96 patients. World J Surg. 2003; 27(4):379-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6705-x. View

5.
Gorter R, Meiring S, van der Lee J, Heij H . Intervention not always necessary in post-appendectomy abscesses in children; clinical experience in a tertiary surgical centre and an overview of the literature. Eur J Pediatr. 2016; 175(9):1185-1191. PMC: 5005384. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2756-0. View