» Articles » PMID: 30478094

Carfilzomib Vs Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Renal Failure: a Subgroup Analysis of ENDEAVOR

Overview
Journal Blood
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Hematology
Date 2018 Nov 28
PMID 30478094
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In ENDEAVOR, carfilzomib (56 mg/m) and dexamethasone (Kd56) demonstrated longer progression-free survival (PFS) over bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here we evaluated Kd56 vs Vd by baseline renal function in a post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis. The intent-to-treat population included 929 patients (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≥15 to <50 mL/min, n = 85 and n = 99; CrCL 50 to <80 mL/min, n = 186 and n = 177; and CrCL ≥80 mL/min, n = 193 and n = 189 for Kd56 and Vd arms, respectively). In these respective subgroups, median PFS was 14.9 vs 6.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.320-0.757), 18.6 vs 9.4 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.351-0.652), and not reached (NR) vs 12.2 months (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.434-0.827) for those receiving Kd56 vs Vd, respectively; median overall survival (OS) was 42.1 vs 23.7 months (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.443-0.989), 42.5 vs 32.8 months (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.626-1.104), and NR vs 42.3 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.554-1.009). Complete renal response (ie, CrCL improvement to ≥60 mL/min in any 2 consecutive visits if baseline CrCL <50 mL/min) rates were 15.3% (95% CI, 8.4-24.7) and 14.1% (95% CI, 8.0-22.6) for those receiving Kd56 vs Vd, respectively. In a combined Kd56 and Vd analysis, complete renal responders had longer median PFS (14.1 vs 9.4 months; HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.438-1.481) and OS (35.3 vs 29.7 months; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.524-1.577) vs nonresponders. Grade ≥3 adverse event rates in the respective subgroups were 87.1% vs 79.4%, 84.4% vs 71.8%, and 77.1% vs 65.9% for those receiving Kd56 vs Vd, respectively. Thus, Kd56 demonstrated PFS and OS improvements over Vd in RRMM patients regardless of their baseline renal function. The ENDEAVOR trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01568866.

Citing Articles

Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone are safe and effective in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: final report of the single-arm, multicenter, phase II ALLG MM018/AMN002 study.

Ninkovic S, Harrison S, Lee J, Murphy N, Lee J, Estell J Haematologica. 2024; 109(7):2229-2238.

PMID: 38235519 PMC: 11215365. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284238.


Difficult-to-treat patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A review of clinical trial results.

Raab M, Zamagni E, Manier S, Rodriguez-Otero P, Schjesvold F, Broijl A EJHaem. 2023; 4(4):1117-1131.

PMID: 38024633 PMC: 10660429. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.743.


Risk factors associated with overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma following carfilzomib treatment: A retrospective study from a large claims database in Japan.

Hagiwara H, Nakayama T, Hashimoto H, Kusumoto S, Fukuta H, Kamiya T Cancer Med. 2023; 12(19):19361-19371.

PMID: 37750384 PMC: 10587963. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6457.


The first relapse in multiple myeloma: how to pick the next best thing.

Devarakonda S, Sharma N, Efebera Y Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022; 2022(1):560-568.

PMID: 36485087 PMC: 9821240. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2022000356.


An overview of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment.

Dimopoulos M, Mikhael J, Terpos E, Leleu X, Moreau P, Blade J Ther Adv Hematol. 2022; 13:20406207221088458.

PMID: 35392438 PMC: 8980434. DOI: 10.1177/20406207221088458.


References
1.
Kyle R, Gertz M, Witzig T, Lust J, Lacy M, Dispenzieri A . Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003; 78(1):21-33. DOI: 10.4065/78.1.21. View

2.
Hajek R, Masszi T, Petrucci M, Palumbo A, Rosinol L, Nagler A . A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS). Leukemia. 2016; 31(1):107-114. PMC: 5220126. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.176. View

3.
Joao C, Freitas J, Gomes F, Geraldes C, Coelho I, Neves M . Lenalidomide is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and very severe renal impairment. Ann Hematol. 2016; 95(6):931-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2662-6. View

4.
Richardson P, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Singhal S, Jagannath S, Irwin D . A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(26):2609-17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa030288. View

5.
Qian Y, Bhowmik D, Bond C, Wang S, Colman S, Hernandez R . Renal impairment and use of nephrotoxic agents in patients with multiple myeloma in the clinical practice setting in the United States. Cancer Med. 2017; 6(7):1523-1530. PMC: 5504317. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1075. View