Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-57 and -29 Item Short Forms Among Kidney Transplant Recipients
Overview
Rehabilitation Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) aims to address the lack of generalizable and universal measure of patient-reported outcomes to assess health-related quality of life. It has not been validated for patients with chronic kidney disease. We aim to validate the PROMIS-57 and PROMIS-29 questionnaires among kidney transplant recipients.
Methods: A cross-sectional sample of stable kidney transplant recipients was recruited. Each participant completed PROMIS-57, a 57-question instrument covering seven domains-physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, sleep disturbance, and social functioning-alongside validated legacy questionnaires [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), General Anxiety Disorder (GAD7), Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale revised (ESASr), and Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL-36)]. PROMIS-29, a 29-question instrument, is nested within PROMIS-57 and measures the same domains. Structural validity of PROMIS was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis, reported using the Comparative Fit Index (CFI). Construct validity was assessed with known-groups comparisons. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's α and convergent validity was assessed with Spearman's Rho. Test-retest reliability was assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results: Mean (± SD) age of the 177 participants was 50 (± 17), 57% were male and 55% Caucasian. Internal consistency of each domain was high (Cronbach's α > 0.88). Confirmatory factor analysis showed good structural validity for most domains (CFI > 0.95, RMSEA < 0.05). Test-retest reliability indicated good agreement (ICC > 0.6). Known-groups comparisons by clinical and socio-demographic differences were found as hypothesized.
Conclusions: Our results provide evidence that PROMIS-57 and PROMIS-29 are highly reliable and valid instruments among kidney transplant recipients. We propose it as a valuable tool to assess important domains of the illness experience.
Yamauchi J, Cizik A, Fornadi K, Thomas D, Raghavan D, Jweehan D Transpl Int. 2025; 38:13884.
PMID: 39944218 PMC: 11813690. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2025.13884.
Phongsaphakjarukorn N, Kanlayanaphotporn R, Jensen M, Janwantanakul P Pain Rep. 2024; 9(4):e1170.
PMID: 38910868 PMC: 11191038. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001170.
Jaure A, Vastani R, Teixeira-Pinto A, Ju A, Craig J, Viecelli A Kidney Int Rep. 2024; 9(1):87-95.
PMID: 38312789 PMC: 10831350. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.10.018.
Faurot K, Park J, Miller V, Honvoh G, Domeniciello A, Mann J Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023; 4:1231054.
PMID: 37954068 PMC: 10634433. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1231054.
Haneke H, Sulaiman S, Nickel S, Raffaelli B, Jansen J, Kirchberger V J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17).
PMID: 37685685 PMC: 10488376. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175619.