» Articles » PMID: 30467484

The Body As Evidence for the Nature of Language

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Nov 24
PMID 30467484
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Taking its cue from sign languages, this paper proposes that the recruitment and composition of body actions provide evidence for key properties of language and its emergence. Adopting the view that compositionality is the fundamental organizing property of language, we show first that actions of the hands, face, head, and torso in sign languages directly reflect linguistic components, and illuminate certain aspects of compositional organization among them that are relevant for all languages, signed and spoken. Studies of emerging sign languages strengthen the approach by showing that the gradual recruitment of bodily articulators for linguistic functions directly maps the way in which a new language increases in complexity and efficiency over time. While compositional communication is almost exclusively restricted to humans, it is not restricted to language. In the spontaneous, intense emotional displays of athletes, different emotional states are correlated with actions of particular face and body features and feature groupings. These findings indicate a much more ancient communicative compositional capacity, and support a paradigm that includes visible body actions in the quest for core linguistic properties and their origins.

Citing Articles

Conversational facial signals combine into compositional meanings that change the interpretation of speaker intentions.

Trujillo J, Holler J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2286.

PMID: 38280963 PMC: 10821935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52589-0.


Visual bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction.

Holler J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1859):20210094.

PMID: 35876208 PMC: 9310176. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0094.


What Is a Language? Who Is Bilingual? Perceptions Underlying Self-Assessment in Studies of Bilingualism.

Wagner D, Bialystok E, Grundy J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:863991.

PMID: 35645938 PMC: 9134110. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863991.


Multilevel rhythms in multimodal communication.

Pouw W, Proksch S, Drijvers L, Gamba M, Holler J, Kello C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021; 376(1835):20200334.

PMID: 34420378 PMC: 8380971. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0334.


A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab.

Pouw W, Dingemanse M, Motamedi Y, Ozyurek A Cogn Sci. 2021; 45(7):e13014.

PMID: 34288069 PMC: 8365719. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13014.


References
1.
Muller C . Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations?. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1651. PMC: 6143805. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651. View

2.
Hauser M, Chomsky N, Fitch W . The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science. 2002; 298(5598):1569-79. DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569. View

3.
Sandler W, Meir I, Padden C, Aronoff M . The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(7):2661-5. PMC: 548320. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405448102. View

4.
Stokoe Jr W . Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. 1960. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004; 10(1):3-37. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni001. View

5.
Ormel E, Hermans D, Knoors H, Hendriks A, Verhoeven L . Phonological activation during visual word recognition in deaf and hearing children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010; 53(4):801-20. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/08-0033). View