» Articles » PMID: 30466451

The Inequality of Inpatient Care Net Benefit Under Integration of Urban-rural Medical Insurance Systems in China

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Nov 24
PMID 30466451
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: China has recently made efforts to integrate urban and rural basic medical insurance systems in order to ensure both urban and rural enrollees obtain unified benefits. However, whether the distribution of government healthcare subsides has become more equitable remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze determinants of and inequality in net inpatient care benefits under the integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.

Methods: Data were obtained from a nationally representative household survey, the Fifth National Health Services Survey (2013), conducted in Anhui province. A multiple regression model and concentration index (CI) was used to estimate related factors and inequality of inpatient care net benefits.

Results: Findings indicated that individuals received more inpatient care benefits when urban and rural social healthcare systems were integrated. Factors associated with net benefits included gender, age, marital status, retirement, educational level, history of chronic diseases, health status, willingness to seek inpatient care and per capita income. The rich were found to disproportionately benefit from inpatient care, and the CI of net benefits for integrated insurance enrollees was the lowest among all three available health insurance schemes. These findings indicate that the recent unification of urban-rural social health insurances reduces inequality in net benefits from government subsidies. Some socioeconomic factors, such as per capita income, 60 years of age and over, history of chronic disease and high educational level positively influence inequality.

Conclusion: In China, accelerating the integration of urban and rural medical insurance systems is an effective way to increase equity of benefit in urban and rural areas. Strategies aimed at reducing inpatient benefit inequality must address socioeconomic factors influencing healthcare outcomes.

Citing Articles

Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.

Zhang Y, Mills A, Xu J BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(11).

PMID: 39496360 PMC: 11535667. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014806.


Health insurance and subjective well-being: evidence from integrating medical insurance across urban and rural areas in China.

Zhou Q, Eggleston K, Liu G Health Policy Plan. 2024; 39(6):564-582.

PMID: 38648378 PMC: 11145920. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czae031.


Does the integration of urban and rural health insurance influence the functional limitations of the middle-aged and elderly in rural China?.

Hao H, Yeo Y SSM Popul Health. 2023; 23:101439.

PMID: 37287716 PMC: 10241964. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101439.


Impacts of unifying urban and rural residents' medical insurance on the hospitalisation expenses of rural patients in eastern China: an interrupted time series analysis.

Qin Z, Liu S, Zhou M, Chen L, Huang W, Shen L BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e067198.

PMID: 37230522 PMC: 10230915. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067198.


The impact of integrated urban and rural resident basic medical insurance on health service equity: Evidence from China.

Li Q, Zhang L, Jian W Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1106166.

PMID: 36992886 PMC: 10040545. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1106166.


References
1.
Makinen M, Waters H, Rauch M, Almagambetova N, Bitran R, Gilson L . Inequalities in health care use and expenditures: empirical data from eight developing countries and countries in transition. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78(1):55-65. PMC: 2560608. View

2.
Mtei G, Makawia S, Ally M, Kuwawenaruwa A, Meheus F, Borghi J . Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania. Health Policy Plan. 2012; 27 Suppl 1:i23-34. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs018. View

3.
Macha J, Harris B, Garshong B, Ataguba J, Akazili J, Kuwawenaruwa A . Factors influencing the burden of health care financing and the distribution of health care benefits in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2012; 27 Suppl 1:i46-54. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs024. View

4.
Borghi J, Maluka S, Kuwawenaruwa A, Makawia S, Tantau J, Mtei G . Promoting universal financial protection: a case study of new management of community health insurance in Tanzania. Health Res Policy Syst. 2013; 11:21. PMC: 3686629. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-21. View

5.
Yuan S, Rehnberg C, Sun X, Liu X, Meng Q . Income related inequalities in New Cooperative Medical Scheme: a five-year empirical study of Junan County in China. Int J Equity Health. 2014; 13:38. PMC: 4032496. DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-38. View