Efficacy of Hearing Conservation Education Programs for Youth and Young Adults: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2018 Nov 24

PMID 30466413

Citations 4

Authors

Khalid M Khan

Sylvanna L Bielko

Marjorie C McCullagh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Many youth and young adults experience high noise exposure compounded by lack of access to hearing health education. Although the need for hearing health education programs is evident, the efficacy of these programs for youth is unclear. We evaluated the literature for efficacy of various hearing conservation programs aimed at youth and young adults, and analyzed their strengths and limitations.

Methods: Studies reporting results of hearing conservation or hearing loss prevention programs with youth or young adults, using randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, experimental design, or qualitative research, and published in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2001 and 2018 were included. Studies were found through searches of selected literature databases (i.e., PubMed, Google Scholar, NIOSH Toxline, and Scopus). Identified publications were assessed for relevance, and data were extracted from the studies deemed relevant.

Results: A total of 10 studies were included. Very little evidence of efficacy of hearing conservation educational programs was found in these studies. Several methodological limitations including lack of rigorous study designs, inadequate power, and application of inappropriate statistical analysis were noted. Some use of technology in programs (e.g., smartphone apps, mobile phone text messages, and computers) was observed, but conclusions as to the effectiveness of these tools were limited by the small number of studies and small sample sizes.

Conclusions: The number of studies of educational hearing conservation programs for youth and young adults was low. The efficacy of the program was not reported in most studies, and it is difficult to draw public health conclusions from these studies due to their multiple methodological limitations. While use of technology in hearing conservation educational programs offers promise, its effectiveness has not been studied.

Citing Articles

The development and evaluation of an online hearing loss prevention program.

Thulin A, Kahari K, Malmberg M Prev Med Rep. 2023; 35:102298.

PMID: 37455754 PMC: 10338358. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102298.

Health Education Intervention on Hearing Health Risk Behaviors in College Students.

Wang D, Li C, Wang Y, Wang S, Wu S, Zhang S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4).

PMID: 33562129 PMC: 7914527. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041560.

Which interventions increase hearing protection behaviors during noisy recreational activities? A systematic review.

Loughran M, Lyons S, Plack C, Armitage C BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1376.

PMID: 32919462 PMC: 7488782. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09414-w.

Smartphone Apps in the Context of Tinnitus: Systematic Review.

Mehdi M, Riha C, Neff P, Dode A, Pryss R, Schlee W Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(6).

PMID: 32204540 PMC: 7146490. DOI: 10.3390/s20061725.

References

Niskar A, Kieszak S, Holmes A, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody D . Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(1):40-3. DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.1.40. View

Renick K, Crawford J, Wilkins 3rd J . Hearing loss among Ohio farm youth: a comparison to a national sample. Am J Ind Med. 2008; 52(3):233-9. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20668. View

Hetu R, Getty L, Quoc H . Impact of occupational hearing loss on the lives of workers. Occup Med. 1995; 10(3):495-512. View

Lightfoot M, Comulada W, Stover G . Computerized HIV preventive intervention for adolescents: indications of efficacy. Am J Public Health. 2006; 97(6):1027-30. PMC: 1874208. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072652. View

Balanay J, Kearney G . Attitudes toward noise, perceived hearing symptoms, and reported use of hearing protection among college students: Influence of youth culture. Noise Health. 2015; 17(79):394-405. PMC: 4900475. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.169701. View

Yamato T, Maher C, Koes B, Moseley A . The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 86:176-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002. View

Lander L, Rudnick S, Perry M . Assessing noise exposures in farm youths. J Agromedicine. 2007; 12(2):25-32. DOI: 10.1300/J096v12n02_03. View

Lukes E, Johnson M . Hearing conservation. Community outreach program for high school students. AAOHN J. 1998; 46(7):340-3. View

Serra M, Biassoni E, Richter U, Minoldo G, Franco G, Abraham S . Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Part I: an interdisciplinary long-term study. Int J Audiol. 2005; 44(2):65-73. DOI: 10.1080/14992020400030010. View

10.

Choi S, Peek-Asa C, Sprince N, Rautiainen R, Donham K, A Flamme G . Hearing loss as a risk factor for agricultural injuries. Am J Ind Med. 2005; 48(4):293-301. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20214. View

11.

Khan K, Evans S, Bielko S, Rohlman D . Efficacy of technology-based interventions to increase the use of hearing protections among adolescent farmworkers. Int J Audiol. 2017; 57(2):124-134. PMC: 6987960. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1374568. View

12.

Sadhra S, Jackson C, Ryder T, Brown M . Noise exposure and hearing loss among student employees working in university entertainment venues. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002; 46(5):455-63. View

13.

Yang J, OGara E, Cheng G, Kelly K, Ramirez M, Burmeister L . At what age should children engage in agricultural tasks?. J Rural Health. 2012; 28(4):372-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00412.x. View

14.

Marlenga B, Linneman J, Pickett W, Wood D, Kirkhorn S, Broste S . Randomized trial of a hearing conservation intervention for rural students: long-term outcomes. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(5):e1139-46. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-0770. View

15.

Swinburn T, Hammer M, Neitzel R . Valuing Quiet: An Economic Assessment of U.S. Environmental Noise as a Cardiovascular Health Hazard. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(3):345-53. PMC: 4819987. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.016. View

16.

Gilles A, Paul V . Effectiveness of a preventive campaign for noise-induced hearing damage in adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 78(4):604-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.009. View

17.

Reed D, Kidd P, Westneat S, Rayens M . Agricultural Disability Awareness and Risk Education (AgDARE) for high school students. Inj Prev. 2001; 7 Suppl 1:i59-63. PMC: 1765402. DOI: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i59. View

18.

Lee B, Westaby J, Berg R . Impact of a national rural youth health and safety initiative: results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(10):1743-9. PMC: 1448528. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.10.1743. View

19.

Martin W, Griest S, Sobel J, Howarth L . Randomized trial of four noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus prevention interventions for children. Int J Audiol. 2013; 52 Suppl 1:S41-9. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.743048. View

20.

Griest S, Folmer R, Martin W . Effectiveness of "Dangerous Decibels," a school-based hearing loss prevention program. Am J Audiol. 2007; 16(2):S165-81. DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2007/021). View