Procedure-Specific Volume and Nurse-to-Patient Ratio: Implications for Failure to Rescue Patients Following Liver Surgery
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The effect of various hospital characteristics on failure to rescue (FTR) after liver surgery has not been well examined. We sought to examine the relationship between hospital characteristics and FTR after liver surgery.
Methods: The 2013-2015 Medicare-Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) database was used to identify Medicare beneficiaries who underwent liver surgery. The effect of various hospital characteristics on FTR was compared among the highest mortality hospitals (HMH) and the lowest mortality hospitals (LMH).
Results: Among 4902 patients undergoing hepatectomy, patients treated at HMH had a higher risk of FTR (OR 3.08, 95% CI 2.03-4.66). Hospital factors such as total number of beds (OR 0.80, 95% 0.56-1.15), operating rooms (OR 0.81, 95% 0.57-1.14), and overall hospital surgical volume (OR 0.88, 95% 0.61-1.25) were not associated with FTR (all p > 0.05). In contrast, hospitals with a greater nurse-to-patient ratio had a markedly lower risk of FTR following a complication (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.91; p = 0.007) (Table 3). As volume of liver operations and nurse-to-patient ratio decreased the risk of FTR increased (p > 0.001). After risk-adjusting for patient characteristics, both the effect of surgical volume (adjusted OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94; p = 0.022) and nurse-to-patient ratio (adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90; p = 0.008) remained strongly associated with FTR.
Conclusion: FTR rates varied considerably among hospital performing hepatectomy. Higher procedure-specific hepatectomy volume, as well as a higher nurse-to-patient ratio, accounted for a reduction in the FTR rates. These data highlight the importance of not only procedure volume, but also adequate nurse staffing in reducing FTR and improving mortality following complex procedures such as hepatectomy.
Olthof P, Bouwense S, Bednarsch J, Dewulf M, Kazemier G, Maithel S Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(3):1762-1768.
PMID: 39404989 PMC: 11811460. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16293-7.
Analysis of textbook outcomes for ampullary carcinoma patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Zhang X, Fei H, Guo C, Sun C, Li Z, Li Z World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(10):2259-2271.
PMID: 37969713 PMC: 10642474. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2259.
Borie F, Bourla C, Millat B, Gugenheim J Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):360.
PMID: 37715811 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03076-z.
Practice patterns of hepatobiliary surgery within the military.
Suydam C, Aranda M, OHara T, Kobylarz F, Liang J, Bandera B Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(10):7502-7510.
PMID: 37415016 PMC: 10520085. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10150-6.
Failure to Rescue in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Regional Australian Experience.
Divakaran P, Hong J, Abbas S, Gwini S, Nagra S, Stupart D World J Surg. 2023; 47(9):2145-2153.
PMID: 37225931 PMC: 10208200. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07061-x.