Inter-observer Agreement in Athletes ECG Interpretation Using the Recent International Recommendations for ECG Interpretation in Athletes Among Observers with Different Levels of Expertise

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2018 Nov 22

PMID 30462649

Citations 4

Authors

S Schneiter

L D Trachsel

T Perrin

S Albrecht

T Pirrello

P Eser

B Gojanovic

A Menafoglio

M Wilhelm

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: International criteria for the interpretation of the athlete's electrocardiogram (ECG) have been proposed. We aimed to evaluate the inter-observer agreement among observers with different levels of expertise.

Methods: Consecutive ECGs of Swiss elite athletes (≥14 years), recorded during routine pre-participation screening between 2013 and 2016 at the Swiss Federal Institute of Sports were analysed. A medical student (A), a cardiology fellow (B) and an electrophysiologist (C) interpreted the ECG's independently according to the most recent criteria. The frequencies and percentages for each observer were calculated. An inter-observer reliability analysis using Cohen Kappa (κ) statistics was used to determine consistency among observers.

Results: A total of 287 ECGs (64.1% males) were analysed. Mean age of the athletes was 20.4±4.9 years. The prevalence of abnormal ECG findings was 1.4%. Both, normal and borderline findings in athletes showed moderate to good agreement between all observers. κ scores for abnormal findings resulted in excellent agreement (κ 0.855 in observer A vs C and B vs C to κ 1.000 in observer A vs B). Overall agreement ranged from moderate (κ 0.539; 0.419-0.685 95% CI) between observer B vs C to good agreement (κ 0.720; 0.681-0.821 95% CI) between observer A vs B.

Conclusions: Our cohort of elite athletes had a low prevalence of abnormal ECGs. Agreement in abnormal ECG findings with the use of the recently published International recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes among observers with different levels of expertise was excellent. ECG interpretation resulted in moderate to good overall agreement.

Citing Articles

The International Criteria for Electrocardiogram Interpretation in Athletes: Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.

Petek B, Drezner J, Churchill T Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2024; 16(1):35-49.

PMID: 38280813 PMC: 11207195. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2023.09.006.

The International Criteria for Electrocardiogram Interpretation in Athletes: Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.

Petek B, Drezner J, Churchill T Cardiol Clin. 2022; 41(1):35-49.

PMID: 36368810 PMC: 10292923. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2022.08.003.

The interobserver agreement of ECG abnormalities using Minnesota codes in people with type 2 diabetes.

Nijpels G, van der Heijden A, Elders P, Beulens J, de Vet H PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0255466.

PMID: 34383817 PMC: 8360582. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255466.

Assessment of Hypertension Using Clinical Electrocardiogram Features: A First-Ever Review.

Bird K, Chan G, Lu H, Greeff H, Allen J, Abbott D Front Med (Lausanne). 2020; 7:583331.

PMID: 33344473 PMC: 7746856. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.583331.

References

Brosnan M, La Gerche A, Kumar S, Lo W, Kalman J, Prior D . Modest agreement in ECG interpretation limits the application of ECG screening in young athletes. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 12(1):130-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.09.060. View

Postema P, de Jong J, van der Bilt I, Wilde A . Accurate electrocardiographic assessment of the QT interval: teach the tangent. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5(7):1015-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.03.037. View

Drezner J, Sharma S, Baggish A, Papadakis M, Wilson M, Prutkin J . International criteria for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: Consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51(9):704-731. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097331. View

Perrin T, Trachsel L, Schneiter S, Menafoglio A, Albrecht S, Pirrello T . Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in Swiss elite athletes detected with modern screening criteria. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017; 146:w14376. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2016.14376. View

Dhutia H, Malhotra A, Yeo T, Chis Ster I, Gabus V, Steriotis A . Inter-Rater Reliability and Downstream Financial Implications of Electrocardiography Screening in Young Athletes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10(8):e003306. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003306. View

Hill A, Miyake C, Grady S, Dubin A . Accuracy of interpretation of preparticipation screening electrocardiograms. J Pediatr. 2011; 159(5):783-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.014. View

Dhutia H, Malhotra A, Gabus V, Merghani A, Finocchiaro G, Millar L . Cost Implications of Using Different ECG Criteria for Screening Young Athletes in the United Kingdom. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(7):702-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.076. View

Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Bjornstad H, Vanhees L, Biffi A, Borjesson M . Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. Consensus Statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac.... Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(5):516-24. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi108. View

Sharma S, Drezner J, Baggish A, Papadakis M, Wilson M, Prutkin J . International recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes. Eur Heart J. 2017; 39(16):1466-1480. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw631. View

10.

Exeter D, Elley C, Fulcher M, Lee A, Drezner J, Asif I . Standardised criteria improve accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48(15):1167-71. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093360. View

11.

Sheikh N, Papadakis M, Ghani S, Zaidi A, Gati S, Adami P . Comparison of electrocardiographic criteria for the detection of cardiac abnormalities in elite black and white athletes. Circulation. 2014; 129(16):1637-49. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006179. View

12.

Drezner J, Prutkin J, Harmon K, OKane J, Pelto H, Rao A . Cardiovascular screening in college athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65(21):2353-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.072. View

13.

Maron B, Levine B, Washington R, Baggish A, Kovacs R, Maron M . Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 2: Preparticipation Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in Competitive Athletes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(21):2356-2361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.034. View

14.

Berte B, Duytschaever M, Elices J, Kataria V, Timmers L, Van Heuverswyn F . Variability in interpretation of the electrocardiogram in young athletes: an unrecognized obstacle for electrocardiogram-based screening protocols. Europace. 2015; 17(9):1435-40. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu385. View

15.

Napolitano C, Bloise R, Priori S . Long QT syndrome and short QT syndrome: how to make correct diagnosis and what about eligibility for sports activity. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006; 7(4):250-6. DOI: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000219317.12504.5f. View

16.

Drezner J, Ackerman M, Anderson J, Ashley E, Asplund C, Baggish A . Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the 'Seattle criteria'. Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47(3):122-4. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092067. View

17.

Viera A, Garrett J . Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005; 37(5):360-3. View

18.

Kligfield P, Gettes L, Bailey J, Childers R, Deal B, Hancock E . Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(10):1109-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.024. View

19.

Marek J, Bufalino V, Davis J, Marek K, Gami A, Stephan W . Feasibility and findings of large-scale electrocardiographic screening in young adults: data from 32,561 subjects. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8(10):1555-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.024. View

20.

Sharma S, Drezner J, Baggish A, Papadakis M, Wilson M, Prutkin J . International Recommendations for Electrocardiographic Interpretation in Athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(8):1057-1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.015. View