» Articles » PMID: 30462208

Atrial Fibrillation Burden, Progression, and the Risk of Death: a Case-crossover Analysis in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Overview
Journal Europace
Date 2018 Nov 22
PMID 30462208
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased mortality, but the temporal relationship between AF burden (AFB) and death among patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices is unknown. We sought to characterize the timing and progression of AFB before death.

Methods And Results: Using Merlin.netTM remote monitoring (RM) data, we analysed weekly AFB in patients age ≥55 years implanted with dual-chamber pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices whose death was verified in the Social Security Death Index and who had continuous RM from 1 year to 4 weeks preceding death. Atrial fibrillation burden was defined as amount of time per week atrial rate exceeded a set threshold of 180 b.p.m. Case-crossover analysis was used to compare the AFB at every week to 6 control weeks at the start of the year before death. There were 3131 patients meeting analysis criteria (age at death 76 ± 8 years, 70% men). Weekly increase in AFB >6 h was associated with increased odds of death, which was greatest at 4 weeks before death [odds ratio (OR) 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.09-2.53; P < 0.001]. Atrial fibrillation progression week-to-week >24 h was associated with the greatest odds of death (OR 12.95, 95% 8.72-19.22; P < 0.001). A combination of AFB >6 h per week and activity <0.5 h per day was associated with an increased odds of death.

Conclusion: In this large patient cohort, AFB progression accelerated in the weeks leading to death. Continuous monitoring of AFB may help identify device patients who may be at risk for adverse outcomes, including death.

Citing Articles

Atrial fibrillation burden in clinical practice, research, and technology development: a clinical consensus statement of the European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke and the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Doehner W, Boriani G, Potpara T, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Passman R, Sposato L Europace. 2025; 27(3).

PMID: 40073206 PMC: 11901050. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaf019.


Use of continuous cardiac monitoring to assess the influence of atrial fibrillation burden and patterns on patient symptoms and healthcare utilization: The DEFINE AFib study.

Lakkireddy D, Russo A, Hylek E, Mittal S, Peacock J, Hills M Heart Rhythm O2. 2025; 5(12):951-956.

PMID: 39803627 PMC: 11721724. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.018.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.


Using Atrial Fibrillation Burden Trends and Machine Learning to Predict Near-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Hospitalization.

Peacock J, Stanelle E, Johnson L, Hylek E, Kanwar R, Lakkireddy D Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024; 17(11):e012991.

PMID: 39445440 PMC: 11575902. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012991.


Association of Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Mortality Among Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Peigh G, Zhou J, Rosemas S, Roberts A, Longacre C, Trinh K Circulation. 2024; 150(5):350-361.

PMID: 38940005 PMC: 11286354. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069757.