» Articles » PMID: 30459664

Emotional Empathy As a Mechanism of Synchronisation in Child-Robot Interaction

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Nov 22
PMID 30459664
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Simulating emotional experience, emotional empathy is the fundamental ingredient of interpersonal communication. In the speaker-listener scenario, the speaker is always a child, the listener is a human or a toy robot. Two groups of neurotypical children aged 6 years on average composed the population: one Japanese ( = 20) and one French ( = 20). Revealing potential similarities in communicative exchanges in both groups when in contact with a human or a toy robot, the results might signify that emotional empathy requires the implication of an automatic identification. In this sense, emotional empathy might be considered a broad idiosyncrasy, a kind of synchronisation, offering the mind a peculiar form of communication. Our findings seem to be consistent with the assumption that children's brains would be constructed to simulate the feelings of others in order to ensure interpersonal synchronisation.

Citing Articles

Will the Artificial Intelligence Touch Substitute for the Human Touch?.

Grandi L, Bruni S NeuroSci. 2024; 5(3):254-264.

PMID: 39483277 PMC: 11469742. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci5030020.


A social robot connected with chatGPT to improve cognitive functioning in ASD subjects.

Bertacchini F, Demarco F, Scuro C, Pantano P, Bilotta E Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1232177.

PMID: 37868599 PMC: 10585023. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232177.


Exploring Teens as Robot Operators, Users and Witnesses in the Wild.

Bjorling E, Thomas K, Rose E, Cakmak M Front Robot AI. 2021; 7:5.

PMID: 33501174 PMC: 7805768. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00005.


Moving in unison after perceptual interruption.

Bardy B, Calabrese C, De Lellis P, Bourgeaud S, Colomer C, Pla S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18032.

PMID: 33093528 PMC: 7582161. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74914-z.


Ordered interpersonal synchronisation in ASD children via robots.

Giannopulu I, Etournaud A, Terada K, Velonaki M, Watanabe T Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):17380.

PMID: 33060720 PMC: 7567844. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74438-6.


References
1.
Porges S . A phylogenetic journey through the vague and ambiguous Xth cranial nerve: a commentary on contemporary heart rate variability research. Biol Psychol. 2006; 74(2):301-7. PMC: 1828879. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.08.007. View

2.
Llobera J, Charbonnier C, Chague S, Preissmann D, Antonietti J, Ansermet F . The Subjective Sensation of Synchrony: An Experimental Study. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0147008. PMC: 4752214. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147008. View

3.
Lischke A, Pahnke R, Mau-Moeller A, Behrens M, Grabe H, Freyberger H . Inter-individual Differences in Heart Rate Variability Are Associated with Inter-individual Differences in Empathy and Alexithymia. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:229. PMC: 5836598. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00229. View

4.
Carr L, Iacoboni M, Dubeau M, Mazziotta J, Lenzi G . Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(9):5497-502. PMC: 154373. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0935845100. View

5.
Tramacere A, Ferrari P . Faces in the mirror, from the neuroscience of mimicry to the emergence of mentalizing. J Anthropol Sci. 2016; 94:113-26. DOI: 10.4436/JASS.94037. View