» Articles » PMID: 30458800

Blood Pressure Waveform Contour Analysis for Assessing Peripheral Resistance Changes in Sepsis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Nov 22
PMID 30458800
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This paper proposes a methodology for helping bridge the gap between the complex waveform information frequently available in an intensive care unit and the simple, lumped values favoured for rapid clinical diagnosis and management. This methodology employs a simple waveform contour analysis approach to compare aortic, femoral and central venous pressure waveforms on a beat-by-beat basis and extract lumped metrics pertaining to the pressure drop and pressure-pulse amplitude attenuation as blood passes through the various sections of systemic circulation.

Results: Validation encompasses a comparison between novel metrics and well-known, analogous clinical metrics such as mean arterial and venous pressures, across an animal model of induced sepsis. The novel metric O, the direct pressure offset between the femoral artery and vena cava, and the clinical metric, ΔMP, the difference between mean arterial and venous pressure, performed well. However, O reduced the optimal average time to sepsis detection after endotoxin infusion from 46.2 min for ΔMP to 11.6 min, for a slight increase in false positive rate from 1.8 to 6.2%. Thus, the novel O provided the best combination of specificity and sensitivity, assuming an equal weighting to both, of the metrics assessed.

Conclusions: Overall, the potential of these novel metrics in the detection of diagnostic shifts in physiological behaviour, here driven by sepsis, is demonstrated.

Citing Articles

Association between delayed invasive blood pressure monitoring and all-cause mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.

Xiao L, Shen P, Han X, Yu Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1446890.

PMID: 39568753 PMC: 11576211. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1446890.

References
1.
Pineda L, Hathwar V, Grant B . Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2001; 120(3):791-5. DOI: 10.1378/chest.120.3.791. View

2.
Angus D, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky M . Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(7):1303-10. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002. View

3.
Gershengorn H, Garland A, Kramer A, Scales D, Rubenfeld G, Wunsch H . Variation of arterial and central venous catheter use in United States intensive care units. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120(3):650-64. PMC: 4145875. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000008. View

4.
Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Lin W, Zhang H, Zhou X . Challenges and opportunities in cardiovascular health informatics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60(3):633-42. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2244892. View

5.
Hann C, Chase J, Shaw G . Integral-based identification of patient specific parameters for a minimal cardiac model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006; 81(2):181-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.11.004. View