» Articles » PMID: 30457078

Course of Cognitive Functioning in Institutionalized Persons With Moderate to Severe Dementia: Evidence From the Severe Impairment Battery Short Version

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2018 Nov 21
PMID 30457078
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To adequately monitor the course of cognitive functioning in persons with moderate to severe dementia, relevant cognitive tests for the advanced dementia stages are needed. We examined the ability of a test developed for the advanced dementia stages, the Severe Impairment Battery Short version (SIB-S), to measure cognitive change over time. Second, we examined type of memory impairment measured with the SIB-S in different dementia stages.

Methods: Participants were institutionalized persons with moderate to severe dementia (N = 217). The SIB-S was administered at 6-month intervals during a 2-year period. Dementia severity at baseline was classified according to Global Deterioration Scale criteria. We used mixed models to evaluate the course of SIB-S total and domain scores, and whether dementia stage at baseline affected these courses.

Results: SIB-S total scores declined significantly over time, and the course of decline differed significantly between dementia stages at baseline. Persons with moderately severe dementia declined faster in mean SIB-S total scores than persons with moderate or severe dementia. Between persons with moderate and moderately severe dementia, there was only a difference in the rate of decline of semantic items, but not episodic and non-semantic items.

Conclusions: Although modest floor and slight ceiling effects were noted in severe and milder cases, respectively, the SIB-S proved to be one of few available adequate measures of cognitive change in institutionalized persons with moderate to severe dementia. (JINS, 2019, 25, 204-214).

Citing Articles

Evaluating Residual Cognition in Advanced Cognitive Impairment: The Residual Cognition Assessment.

Soli A, Savoldelli G, Rota A, Zonca S, Belotti G, Lazzarini F Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021; 50(5):460-472.

PMID: 34879370 PMC: 8820420. DOI: 10.1159/000520322.


How impaired is too impaired? Exploring futile neuropsychological test patterns as a function of dementia severity and cognitive screening scores.

Kiselica A, Johnson E, Benge J J Neuropsychol. 2021; 15(3):410-427.

PMID: 33655681 PMC: 8413392. DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12243.

References
1.
Schmitt F, Ashford W, Ernesto C, Saxton J, Schneider L, Clark C . The severe impairment battery: concurrent validity and the assessment of longitudinal change in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997; 11 Suppl 2:S51-6. View

2.
Hodges J, Patterson K . Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer's disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia. 1995; 33(4):441-59. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00127-b. View

3.
Boersma F, Eefsting J, van den Brink W, van Tilburg W . Care services for dementia patients: predictors for service utilization. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998; 12(11):1119-26. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199711)12:11<1119::aid-gps702>3.0.co;2-h. View

4.
Thomas R, Albert M, Petersen R, Aisen P . Longitudinal decline in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: Analyses of placebo data from clinical trials. Alzheimers Dement. 2016; 12(5):598-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.01.002. View

5.
Ahn I, Kim J, Saxton J, Kim D . Reliability and validity of a short form of the Severe Impairment Battery in Korean Alzheimer's disease patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006; 22(7):682-7. DOI: 10.1002/gps.1731. View