» Articles » PMID: 30456438

Milk Intake and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Women

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Nov 21
PMID 30456438
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Although diet is associated with breast cancer risk, there are limited studies linking adult diet, including milk intake, with mammographic density. Here, we investigate the association of milk intake with mammographic density in premenopausal women.

Methods: We analyzed data from 375 cancer-free premenopausal women who had routine screening mammography at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri in 2016. We used Volpara to measure volumetric percent density, dense volume, and non-dense volume. We collected information on recent milk intake (past 12 months), and categorized skim milk and low/reduced-fat milk intake into 4 groups: < 1/week, 1/week, 2-6 times/week, ≥ 1/day, while whole and soy milk intake were categorized into 2 groups: < 1/week, ≥ 1/week. We used multivariable linear regression model to evaluate the associations of milk intake and log-transformed volumetric percent density, dense volume, and non-dense volume.

Results: In multivariable analyses, volumetric percent density was 20% (p-value = 0.003) lower in the 1/week group, 14% (p-value = 0.047) lower in the 2-6/week group, and 12% (p-value = 0.144) lower in the ≥ 1/day group (p-trend = 0.011) compared with women who consumed low/reduced-fat milk < 1/week. Attenuated and non-significant associations were observed for low/reduced-fat milk intake and dense volume. There were no associations of whole, skim, and soy milk intake with volumetric percent density and dense volume.

Conclusions: Recent low/reduced-fat milk intake was inversely associated with volumetric percent density in premenopausal women. Studies on childhood and adolescent milk intake and adult mammographic density in premenopausal women are needed.

Citing Articles

The epidemiologic factors associated with breast density: A review.

Ye D, Yu T J Res Med Sci. 2022; 27:53.

PMID: 36092490 PMC: 9450246. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_962_21.


Family History of Breast Cancer and Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women.

Han Y, Moore J, Colditz G, Toriola A JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(2):e2148983.

PMID: 35175341 PMC: 8855232. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48983.


Coffee, Tea, and Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women.

Odama A, Otti V, Xu S, Adebayo O, Toriola A Nutrients. 2021; 13(11).

PMID: 34836118 PMC: 8623272. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113852.


Adolescent and early adulthood inflammation-associated dietary patterns in relation to premenopausal mammographic density.

Garzia N, Cushing-Haugen K, Kensler T, Tamimi R, Harris H Breast Cancer Res. 2021; 23(1):71.

PMID: 34233736 PMC: 8261986. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01449-0.


Medication use and mammographic breast density.

Han Y, Lee C, Xu S, Mi X, Phillip C, Salazar A Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 189(2):585-592.

PMID: 34196899 PMC: 9059256. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06321-5.


References
1.
Alimujiang A, Imm K, Appleton C, Colditz G, Berkey C, Toriola A . Adiposity at Age 10 and Mammographic Density among Premenopausal Women. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2018; 11(5):287-294. PMC: 7473460. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0309. View

2.
Vachon C, van Gils C, Sellers T, Ghosh K, Pruthi S, Brandt K . Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 2008; 9(6):217. PMC: 2246184. DOI: 10.1186/bcr1829. View

3.
Huth P, DiRienzo D, Miller G . Major scientific advances with dairy foods in nutrition and health. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 89(4):1207-21. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72190-7. View

4.
Byers K, Savaiano D . The myth of increased lactose intolerance in African-Americans. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005; 24(6 Suppl):569S-73S. DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2005.10719505. View

5.
Maskarinec G, Takata Y, Franke A, Williams A, Murphy S . A 2-year soy intervention in premenopausal women does not change mammographic densities. J Nutr. 2004; 134(11):3089-94. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.11.3089. View