» Articles » PMID: 30455053

Comprehensive Comparative Compositional Study of the Vapour Phase of Cigarette Mainstream Tobacco Smoke and Tobacco Heating Product Aerosol

Overview
Journal J Chromatogr A
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2018 Nov 21
PMID 30455053
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A simple direct sample collection/dilution and introduction method was developed using quartz wool and Tenax/sulficarb sorbents for thermal desorption and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (TD-GC × GC) analyses of volatile organic compounds from vapour phase (VP) fractions of aerosol produced by tobacco heating products (THP1.0) and 3R4F mainstream tobacco smoke (MTS). Analyses were carried out using flame ionisation detection (FID) for semi-quantification and both low and high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LR/HR-TOFMS) for qualitative comparison and peak assignment. Qualitative analysis was carried out by combining identification data based on linear retention indices (LRIs) with a match window of ±10 index units, mass spectral forward and reverse library searches (from LR and HRTOFMS spectra) with a match factor threshold of >700 (both forward and reverse), and accurate mass values of ± 3 ppm for increased confidence in peak identification. Using this comprehensive approach of data mining, a total of 79 out of 85 compounds and a total of 198 out of 202 compounds were identified in THP1.0 aerosol and in 3R4F MTS, respectively. Among the identified analytes, a set of 35 compounds was found in both VP sample types. Semi-quantitative analyses were carried out using a chemical class-based external calibration method. Acyclic, alicyclic, aromatic hydrocarbons and ketones appeared to be prominent in 3R4F MTS VP, whereas larger amounts of aldehydes, ketones, heterocyclic hydrocarbons and esters were present in THP1.0 aerosol VP. The results demontsrate the capability and versatility of the method for the characterization and comparison of complex aerosol samples and highlighted the relative chemical simplicity of THP1.0 aerosol in comparison to MTS.

Citing Articles

Non-targeted analytical comparison of a heated tobacco product aerosol against mainstream cigarette smoke: does heating tobacco produce an inherently different set of aerosol constituents?.

Lang G, Henao C, Almstetter M, Arndt D, Goujon C, Maeder S Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 416(6):1349-1361.

PMID: 38217698 PMC: 10861380. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05126-x.


Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy.

Dempsey R, Rodrigo G, Vonmoos F, Gunduz I, Belushkin M, Esposito M Toxicol Rep. 2023; 10():195-205.

PMID: 36748021 PMC: 9898577. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.01.008.


Evaluation of behavioural, chemical, toxicological and clinical studies of a tobacco heated product glo™ and the potential for bridging from a foundational dataset to new product iterations.

Goodall S, Gale N, Thorne D, Hadley S, Prasad K, Gilmour I Toxicol Rep. 2022; 9:1426-1442.

PMID: 36561950 PMC: 9764197. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.06.014.


The Emission of VOCs and CO from Heated Tobacco Products, Electronic Cigarettes, and Conventional Cigarettes, and Their Health Risk.

Lu F, Yu M, Chen C, Liu L, Zhao P, Shen B Toxics. 2022; 10(1).

PMID: 35051050 PMC: 8781168. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10010008.


Functional and metabolic impairment in cigarette smoke-exposed macrophages is tied to oxidative stress.

Aridgides D, Mellinger D, Armstrong D, Hazlett H, Dessaint J, Hampton T Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):9624.

PMID: 31270372 PMC: 6610132. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46045-7.