» Articles » PMID: 30453521

Using Radio-Frequency Identification Technology to Measure Synchronised Ranging of Free-Range Laying Hens

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2018 Nov 21
PMID 30453521
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Free-range laying hen systems provide individuals a choice between indoor and outdoor areas where range use may be socially influenced. This study used radio-frequency identification technology to track the ranging of individually-tagged hens housed in six experimental free-range pens from 28 to 38 weeks of age (46⁻50 hens/pen). All daily visits to the range were used to study group behaviour. Results showed that 67.6% (SD = 5.0%) of all hen movements through the pop-holes outdoors or indoors were following the movement of another hen ('pop-hole-following') compared to only 50.5% of movements in simulated random data. The percentage overlap in time that all combinations of hen pairs within each pen spent simultaneously outdoors or indoors showed a median value of overlap greater than the 90th percentile of random data. Pens housing hens that had been provided variable enrichments from 4 to 21 days (n = 3 pens) showed higher 'pop-hole-following' behaviour and a higher percentage of hen-pair association compared to hens reared in non-enriched conditions (n = 3 pens). These results show that birds in each free-range pen were primarily a cohesive flock and early enrichment improved this social cohesiveness. These results have implications for understanding free-range flock-level behaviour.

Citing Articles

Setting the stage to tag "n" track: a guideline for implementing, validating and reporting a radio frequency identification system for monitoring resource visit behavior in poultry.

Alindekon S, Rodenburg T, Langbein J, Puppe B, Wilmsmeier O, Louton H Poult Sci. 2023; 102(8):102799.

PMID: 37315427 PMC: 10404737. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102799.


Welfare of broilers on farm.

Nielsen S, Alvarez J, Bicout D, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe J EFSA J. 2023; 21(2):e07788.

PMID: 36824680 PMC: 9941850. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7788.


A Comparison of the Plumage Condition of Three Egg-Laying Poultry Genotypes Housed in Non-Cage Systems.

Sokolowicz Z, Dykiel M, Topczewska J, Krawczyk J, Augustynska-Prejsnar A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36670725 PMC: 9854643. DOI: 10.3390/ani13020185.


Similarity in Temporal Movement Patterns in Laying Hens Increases with Time and Social Association.

Gomez Y, Berezowski J, Jorge Y, Gebhardt-Henrich S, Vogeli S, Stratmann A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(5).

PMID: 35268125 PMC: 8908832. DOI: 10.3390/ani12050555.


Automated Tracking Systems for the Assessment of Farmed Poultry.

Neethirajan S Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35158556 PMC: 8833357. DOI: 10.3390/ani12030232.


References
1.
Larsen H, Cronin G, Gebhardt-Henrich S, Smith C, Hemsworth P, Rault J . Individual Ranging Behaviour Patterns in Commercial Free-Range Layers as Observed through RFID Tracking. Animals (Basel). 2017; 7(3). PMC: 5366840. DOI: 10.3390/ani7030021. View

2.
Oden , Vestergaard , Algers . Space use and agonistic behaviour in relation to sex composition in large flocks of laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000; 67(4):307-320. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00123-9. View

3.
Bradshaw R . Discrimination of group members by laying hens Gallus domesticus. Behav Processes. 2014; 24(2):143-51. DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90006-L. View

4.
Duncan I, Widowski T, Malleau A, Lindberg A, Petherick J . External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens. Behav Processes. 2014; 43(2):219-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00017-5. View

5.
Eklund B, Jensen P . Domestication effects on behavioural synchronization and individual distances in chickens (Gallus gallus). Behav Processes. 2010; 86(2):250-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.010. View