» Articles » PMID: 30452705

Web-Based Contingency Management for Adolescent Tobacco Smokers: A Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Nov 20
PMID 30452705
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Adolescence is a critical time when the majority of tobacco users initiate smoking. Contingency management for adolescent smoking cessation has shown promise in previous studies, but efficacy following removal of contingencies is not well understood. This study examined a remote form of contingency management among non-treatment-seeking adolescent smokers.

Methods: Participants (N = 127) submitted breath carbon monoxide (CO) three times daily throughout a 42-day program. For this randomized trial, participants in the active condition (n = 63) were reinforced for providing CO measurements on schedule and below a set criterion, whereas those in the control condition (n = 64) were reinforced for providing CO measurements on schedule. Self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels were collected at several timepoints.

Results: Active condition showed greater within-group reductions in CO levels relative to control condition, but not at 3- or 6-month follow-up. Active condition reported significantly less smoking during treatment compared to control condition, but not at follow-up. There were no significant differences for urinary cotinine. Overall treatment adherence was low, with only 37% and 51% of possible CO samples being submitted among active and control, respectively. Poor treatment adherence may explain the disparity between CO and cotinine results, and poor follow-up treatment efficacy.

Conclusions: This study replicates feasibility of a remote form of contingency management for adolescent smoking. CO results suggest active condition reduced smoking within group, but treatment adherence and posttreatment efficacy was poor. Future research should focus on increasing adherence for this type of program among adolescent smokers.

Implications: This study demonstrates feasibility of a remote form of contingency management therapy for smoking cessation among adolescents, while providing posttreatment efficacy data. Within-group efficacy of this form of treatment is suggested, but treatment adherence and follow-up efficacy were poor. This study underscores the need for further development of contingency management therapy for adolescent smoking cessation, which emphasizes better treatment adherence and posttreatment efficacy.

Citing Articles

Evolution of the substance use landscape: Implications for contingency management.

Goodwin S, Kirby K, Raiff B J Appl Behav Anal. 2024; 58(1):36-55.

PMID: 39193870 PMC: 11803362. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.2911.


Adolescent Tobacco/Nicotine Use and the Potential Role of Contingency Management-based Interventions.

Shirazi A, Radgoudarzi N, Brody A J Addict Med. 2024; 18(2):97-102.

PMID: 38197859 PMC: 10939979. DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001249.


A systematic review of remotely delivered contingency management treatment for substance use.

Coughlin L, Salino S, Jennings C, Lacek M, Townsend W, Koffarnus M J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023; 147:208977.

PMID: 36804352 PMC: 10936237. DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.208977.


A Scoping Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research.

Thrul J, Howe C, Devkota J, Alexander A, Allen A, Businelle M Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(8):1413-1423.

PMID: 36449414 PMC: 10347976. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac271.


Addressing adolescent substance use with a public health prevention framework: the case for harm reduction.

Winer J, Yule A, Hadland S, Bagley S Ann Med. 2022; 54(1):2123-2136.

PMID: 35900132 PMC: 9341337. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2104922.


References
1.
Dutra L, Glantz S . E-cigarettes and National Adolescent Cigarette Use: 2004-2014. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(2). PMC: 5260150. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2450. View

2.
Stoops W, Dallery J, Fields N, Nuzzo P, Schoenberg N, Martin C . An internet-based abstinence reinforcement smoking cessation intervention in rural smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 105(1-2):56-62. PMC: 2743786. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.06.010. View

3.
Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D . Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010; 105(8):1381-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02975.x. View

4.
Reynolds B, Harris M, Slone S, Shelton B, Dallery J, Stoops W . A feasibility study of home-based contingency management with adolescent smokers of rural Appalachia. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015; 23(6):486-93. PMC: 4658218. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000046. View

5.
Eissenberg T, Balster R . Initial tobacco use episodes in children and adolescents: current knowledge, future directions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 59 Suppl 1:S41-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00164-7. View