» Articles » PMID: 30451508

Electrostatically Driven Protein Adsorption: Charge Patches Versus Charge Regulation

Overview
Journal Langmuir
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2018 Nov 20
PMID 30451508
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mechanisms of electrostatically driven adsorption of proteins on charged surfaces are studied with a new theoretical framework. The acid-base behavior, charge distribution, and electrostatic contributions to the thermodynamic properties of the proteins are modeled in the presence of a charged surface. The method is validated against experimental titration curves and apparent p Ks. The theory predicts that electrostatic interactions favor the adsorption of proteins at their isoelectric points on charged surfaces despite the fact that the protein has no net charge in solution. Two known mechanisms explain adsorption under these conditions: (i) charge regulation (the charge of the protein changes due to the presence of the surface) and (ii) charge patches (the protein orients to place charged amino acids near opposite surface charges). This work shows that both mechanisms contribute to adsorption at low ionic strengths, whereas only the charge-patch mechanism operates at high ionic strength. Interestingly, the contribution of charge regulation is insensitive to protein orientation under all conditions, which validates the use of constant-charge simulations to determine the most stable orientation of adsorbed proteins. The present study also shows that the charged surface can induce large shifts in the apparent p Ks of individual amino acids in adsorbed proteins. Our conclusions are valid for all proteins studied in this work (lysozyme, α-amylase, ribonuclease A, and β-lactoglobulin), as well as for proteins that are not isoelectric but have instead a net charge in solution of the same sign as the surface charge, i.e. the problem of protein adsorption on the "wrong side" of the isoelectric point.

Citing Articles

Patchy Charge Distribution Affects the pH in Protein Solutions during Dialysis.

Pineda S, Blanco P, Stano R, Kosovan P Langmuir. 2025; 41(8):5387-5398.

PMID: 39964136 PMC: 11887432. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04942.


Unusual Aspects of Charge Regulation in Flexible Weak Polyelectrolytes.

Blanco P, Narambuena C, Madurga S, Mas F, Garces J Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 37376324 PMC: 10302168. DOI: 10.3390/polym15122680.


Interaction of Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles with Urine and Saliva Biofluids: An Exploratory Study.

Antonio M, Lima T, Vitorino R, Daniel-da-Silva A Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(24).

PMID: 36558287 PMC: 9785464. DOI: 10.3390/nano12244434.


Modeling of the Electrostatic Interaction and Catalytic Activity of [NiFe] Hydrogenases on a Planar Electrode.

Ruiz-Rodriguez M, Cooper C, Rocchia W, Casalegno M, Lopez de Los Santos Y, Raos G J Phys Chem B. 2022; 126(43):8777-8790.

PMID: 36269122 PMC: 9639099. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05371.


Proteins Adsorbing onto Surface-Modified Nanoparticles: Effect of Surface Curvature, pH, and the Interplay of Polymers and Proteins Acid-Base Equilibrium.

Gonzalez Solveyra E, Thompson D, Szleifer I Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(4).

PMID: 35215653 PMC: 8878797. DOI: 10.3390/polym14040739.