» Articles » PMID: 30450441

Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 20
PMID 30450441
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: E-cigarette use has grown in popularity, especially as the devices have been touted as smoking cessation tools. In an exploratory study, we sought to compare dual users (i.e., users of both combustible tobacco and e-cigarettes) to e-cigarette only users.

Methods: The Electronic Cigarette Opinion Survey (ECOS) was employed to assess users' (n=78) perceptions and consumption of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. Quantity of e-juice and nicotine used and time of initial nicotine exposure were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between e-cigarette use behaviors and being an e-cigarette only user compared to a dual user.

Results: Compared to dual users, e-cigarette only users consumed higher levels of nicotine in e-juice (p=0.0009) and more nicotine per month (p=0.03). For dual users, the time of first nicotine exposure after waking was significantly earlier than for e-cigarette only users (mean= 9.6 minutes (SD= 8.0) and mean= 26.6 minutes (SD= 22.0), respectively; p=0.0056). Results from the regression models suggest the amount of e-juice consumed and time of first nicotine exposure after waking are significantly associated with being an e-cigarette only user.

Conclusions: These findings shed light on the perceptions and use patterns of e-cigarette only users compared to dual users. As regulation of e-cigarettes is considered, understanding the impact of e-cigarettes and dual use is imperative. Despite frequent marketing claims that e-cigarettes are completely safe, health campaigns need to convey emerging and mixed findings on safety as well as current scientific uncertainty to the public.

Citing Articles

Combustible cigarette smokers versus dual combustible and electronic users: Evaluation of differences in anxiety, depression, and transdiagnostic constructs among Latinx adults.

Zvolensky M, Shepherd J, Clausen B, Redmond B, de Dios M, Cano M J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2024; :1-18.

PMID: 39145994 PMC: 11828941. DOI: 10.1080/15332640.2024.2391309.


Differences in Pain Severity and Interference between Latinx Combustible Cigarette Smokers and Dual Users with Current Pain.

Zvolensky M, Shepherd J, Clausen B, Ditre J, Smit T, Redmond B Behav Med. 2023; 51(1):7-17.

PMID: 38112190 PMC: 11218863. DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2023.2290480.


Combustible cigarette smokers versus e-cigarette dual users among Latinx individuals: Differences in alcohol and drug use severity.

Zvolensky M, Shepherd J, Clausen B, Redmond B, Correa-Fernandez V, Ditre J Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023; 32(2):197-206.

PMID: 37470998 PMC: 10799193. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000673.


Pain interference among adult dual combustible and electronic tobacco users in terms of perceived barriers for quitting.

Garey L, Smit T, Bizier A, Redmond B, Ditre J, Rogers A Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023; 32(1):45-53.

PMID: 37166909 PMC: 10638470. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000660.


The Substitution of Fifty Percent of Combustible Tobacco Smoke Exposure With Either Electronic Cigarettes or Heated tobacco Products Did Not Attenuate Acute Lung Injury in an Animal Model.

Husari A, El-Harakeh M, Shihadeh A, Zeid Daou M, Bitar H, Karaoghlanian N Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 25(7):1361-1368.

PMID: 36943313 PMC: 10256882. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad045.


References
1.
Steyerberg E, Eijkemans M, Harrell Jr F, Habbema J . Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med. 2000; 19(8):1059-79. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000430)19:8<1059::aid-sim412>3.0.co;2-0. View

2.
McQueen A, Tower S, Sumner W . Interviews with "vapers": implications for future research with electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 13(9):860-7. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr088. View

3.
Etter J, Bullen C . Saliva cotinine levels in users of electronic cigarettes. Eur Respir J. 2011; 38(5):1219-20. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00066011. View

4.
Glasser A, Collins L, Pearson J, Abudayyeh H, Niaura R, Abrams D . Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 52(2):e33-e66. PMC: 5253272. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036. View

5.
Allem J, Unger J, Garcia R, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Sussman S . Tobacco Attitudes and Behaviors of Vape Shop Retailers in Los Angeles. Am J Health Behav. 2015; 39(6):794-8. PMC: 5020702. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.39.6.7. View