» Articles » PMID: 30450274

Strong Association Between Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Behaviour Among Danish Women; A Register-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Prev Med Rep
Date 2018 Nov 20
PMID 30450274
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High coverage is essential for the effectiveness of national screening programmes. Identifying non-screeners across different screening programmes may help inform strategies to improve uptake. This study aims to analyse the association between previous cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage and participation in breast cancer screening (BCS). This historical register-based cohort study included 91,787 Danish women aged 50-64 years who were invited to participate in the first organised round of BCS in the Central Denmark Region (CDR) in 2008-09. CCS coverage was defined as having a smear registered in the 5 1/2 years preceding the BCS, and BCS participants were divided into participants and non-participants and further categorised as active non-participants (ANP) if they cancelled and passive non-participants (PNP) if they abstained from the appointment. Of all 91,787 women included in the study, 62,391 (68%) were covered both by CCS and participated in BCS. Women not covered by CCS were more likely to be non-participants in BCS than women covered by CCS (PRRadjusted = 2.80, 95% CI: 2.68-2.93). Both PNP (PRRadjusted = 3.99, 95% CI: 3.80-4.19) and ANP (PRRadjusted = 2.50, 95% CI: 2.34-2.68) were more likely not to be covered by the CCS. In conclusion, non-coverage by CCS was strongly associated with nonparticipation in BCS. Specific groups of women only participated in one screening programme. To increase uptake, future interventions may specifically target these groups.

Citing Articles

Non-participation in breast screening in Denmark: Sociodemographic determinants.

von Euler-Chelpin M, Napolitano G, Lynge E, Borstrom S, Vejborg I BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2024.

PMID: 39075424 PMC: 11285456. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19547-x.


Protocol of Breast Cancer Prevention Model with Addition of Breast Ultrasound to Routine Gynecological Visits as a Chance for an Early Diagnosis and Treatment in 25 to 49-Year-Old Polish Females.

Sniadecki M, Jaworek P, Chmielewska Z, Poniewierza P, Stasiak M, Danielkiewicz M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36673037 PMC: 9857976. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020227.


The Impact of Morbidity and Disability on Attendance at Organized Breast Cancer-Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

McWilliams L, Groves S, Howell S, French D Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022; 31(7):1275-1283.

PMID: 35511754 PMC: 9377755. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1386.


Determinants of Non-Participation in Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ding L, Wang J, Greuter M, Goossens M, Van Hal G, de Bock G Front Oncol. 2022; 12:817222.

PMID: 35311110 PMC: 8924365. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817222.


Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mottram R, Knerr W, Gallacher D, Fraser H, Al-Khudairy L, Ayorinde A BMJ Open. 2021; 11(11):e046660.

PMID: 34848507 PMC: 8634222. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046660.

References
1.
Labeit A, Peinemann F . Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes. Health Econ Rev. 2015; 5(1):32. PMC: 4615931. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3. View

2.
Aro A, de Koning H, Absetz P, Schreck M . Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002; 70(2):145-53. DOI: 10.1023/a:1012939228916. View

3.
Quan H, Li B, Couris C, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P . Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173(6):676-82. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. View

4.
Lagerlund M, Drake I, Wirfalt E, Sontrop J, Zackrisson S . Health-related lifestyle factors and mammography screening attendance in a Swedish cohort study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014; 24(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000025. View

5.
Cohen S, Palmieri R, Nyante S, Koralek D, Kim S, Bradshaw P . Obesity and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women: a review. Cancer. 2008; 112(9):1892-904. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23408. View