» Articles » PMID: 30447691

Recording of Weight in Electronic Health Records: an Observational Study in General Practice

Overview
Journal BMC Fam Pract
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Nov 19
PMID 30447691
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Routine weight recording in electronic health records (EHRs) could assist general practitioners (GPs) in the identification, prevention, and management of overweight patients. However, the extent to which weight management is embedded in general practice in the Netherlands has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of weight recording in general practice in the Netherlands for patients who self-reported as being overweight. The specific objectives of this study were to assess whether weight recording varied according to patient characteristics, and to determine the frequency of weight recording over time for patients with and without a chronic condition related to being overweight.

Methods: Baseline data from the Occupational and Environmental Health Cohort Study (2012) were combined with data from EHRs of general practices (2012-2015). Data concerned 3446 self-reported overweight patients who visited their GP in 2012, and 1516 patients who visited their GP every year between 2012 and 2015. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were performed to identify associations between patient characteristics and weight recording.

Results: In 2012, weight was recorded in the EHRs of a quarter of patients who self-reported as being overweight. Greater age, lower education level, higher self-reported body mass index, and the presence of diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and/or cardiovascular disorders were associated with higher rates of weight recording. The strongest association was found for diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR = 10.3; 95% CI [7.3, 14.5]). Between 2012 and 2015, 90% of patients with diabetes mellitus had at least one weight measurement recorded in their EHR. In the group of patients without a chronic condition related to being overweight, this percentage was 33%.

Conclusions: Weight was frequently recorded for overweight patients with a chronic condition, for whom regular weight measurement is recommended in clinical guidelines, and for which weight recording is a performance indicator as part of the payment system. For younger patients and those without a chronic condition related to being overweight, weight was less frequently recorded. For these patients, routine recording of weight in EHRs deserves more attention, with the aim to support early recognition and treatment of overweight.

Citing Articles

Recording practices of body mass index, overweight and obesity by Dutch general practitioners: an observational study.

van den Hout W, van Peet P, Numans M, Mook-Kanamori D BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):1.

PMID: 39748290 PMC: 11697458. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02696-8.


Dutch GPs' perspectives on addressing obesity: a qualitative study.

van den Hout W, Adriaanse M, Den Beer Poortugael L, Mook-Kanamori D, Numans M, van Peet P BJGP Open. 2023; 8(1).

PMID: 37802533 PMC: 11169965. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0112.


In it for the long haul: the complexities of managing overweight in family practice: qualitative thematic analysis from the Health eLiteracy for Prevention in General Practice (HeLP-GP) trial.

Paine K, Parker S, Denney-Wilson E, Lloyd J, Randall S, McNamara C BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):57.

PMID: 36850020 PMC: 9972770. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01995-w.


Enablers and barriers to implementing obesity assessments in clinical practice: a rapid mixed-methods systematic review.

Atlantis E, Chimoriya R, Seifu C, Peters K, Murphy G, Carr B BMJ Open. 2022; 12(11):e063659.

PMID: 36446466 PMC: 9710371. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063659.


What is next for screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation? Artificial intelligence may hold the key.

Nadarajah R, Wu J, Frangi A, Hogg D, Cowan C, Gale C Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021; 8(4):391-397.

PMID: 34940849 PMC: 9170568. DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab094.


References
1.
Badenbroek I, Stol D, Nielen M, Hollander M, Kraaijenhagen R, de Wit G . Design of the INTEGRATE study: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a cardiometabolic risk assessment and treatment program integrated in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2014; 15:90. PMC: 4022539. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-90. View

2.
Bhaskaran K, Forbes H, Douglas I, Leon D, Smeeth L . Representativeness and optimal use of body mass index (BMI) in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). BMJ Open. 2013; 3(9):e003389. PMC: 3773634. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003389. View

3.
McLaughlin J, Hamilton K, Kipping R . Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2017; 67(663):e676-e683. PMC: 5604831. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692309. View

4.
Baer H, Karson A, Soukup J, Williams D, Bates D . Documentation and diagnosis of overweight and obesity in electronic health records of adult primary care patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(17):1648-52. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7815. View

5.
van Dijk L, Otters H, Schuit A . Moderately overweight and obese patients in general practice: a population based survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2006; 7:43. PMC: 1564048. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-43. View