» Articles » PMID: 30446875

The Effect of a High-impact Jumping Intervention on Bone Mass, Bone Stiffness and Fitness Parameters in Adolescent Athletes

Overview
Journal Arch Osteoporos
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Nov 18
PMID 30446875
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effect of a jumping intervention on bone mass, bone stiffness and fitness parameters in adolescents involved in different sports.

Methods: Ninety-three adolescent male swimmers (SWI), footballers (FOO) and cyclists (CYC) were randomised to intervention (INT) and sport (INT-SWI = 19, INT-FOO = 15, INT-CYC = 14) or sport only (CON-SWI = 18, CON-FOO = 15, CON-CYC = 12) groups. The 9-month jumping intervention consisted of 3 levels (12 weeks each) of 20 repetitions per set of counter movement jumps (CMJ) using adjustable weight vests (level 1 = 20 CMJ jumps/set, 0 kg, 3 sets/day, 3 times/week; level 2 = 20 CMJ jumps/set, 2 kg, 4 sets/day, 3 times/week; level 3 = 20 CMJ jumps/set, 5 kg, 4 sets/day, 4 times/week). Total body bone mineral content (BMC) at total body less head (TBLH) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bone stiffness using quantitative ultrasound. Fitness was assessed using the 20-m shuttle run (20mSRT), CMJ and standing long jump (SLJ) tests.

Results: INT-SWI had significantly higher increase in BMC legs and bone stiffness compared to CON-SWI (4.2-12.7%). INT-CYC had significantly higher increase in BMC at TBLH and legs and bone stiffness compared to CON-CYC (5.0-12.3%). There were no significant differences between INT-FOO and CON-FOO in any bone outcomes (0.9-3.9%). The increase in CMJ performance was significantly higher in INT-SWI (3.1 cm) and INT-CYC (3.2 cm) compared to CON-SWI and CON-CYC groups, respectively.

Conclusions: A 9-month jumping intervention can improve bone mass, bone stiffness and muscular fitness in adolescent males participating in non-osteogenic sports, such as swimming and cycling.

Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN17982776.

Citing Articles

Biomechanics of a Drop Landing: Osteogenic Stimulus Measures May Vary.

Wilzman A, Wong D, Troy K J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2025; 25(1):1-17.

PMID: 40024223 PMC: 11880855. DOI: 10.22540/JMNI-25-001.


Criteria and Guidelines for Returning to Running Following a Tibial Bone Stress Injury: A Scoping Review.

George E, Sheerin K, Reid D Sports Med. 2024; 54(9):2247-2265.

PMID: 39141251 PMC: 11393297. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02051-y.


Resistance training presents beneficial effects on bone development of adolescents engaged in swimming but not in impact sports: ABCD Growth Study.

Agostinete R, Werneck A, Narciso P, Ubago-Guisado E, Coelho-E-Silva M, Bielemann R BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):247.

PMID: 38594697 PMC: 11003018. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04634-0.


Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) Indicators in Male Adolescent Endurance Athletes: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study.

Stenqvist T, Melin A, Torstveit M Nutrients. 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38140345 PMC: 10745353. DOI: 10.3390/nu15245086.


The Role of Oxidative Stress in Multiple Exercise-Regulated Bone Homeostasis.

Gao H, Zhao Y, Zhao L, Wang Z, Yan K, Gao B Aging Dis. 2023; 14(5):1555-1582.

PMID: 37196112 PMC: 10529750. DOI: 10.14336/AD.2023.0223.


References
1.
Maimoun L, Coste O, Mura T, Philibert P, Galtier F, Mariano-Goulart D . Specific bone mass acquisition in elite female athletes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98(7):2844-53. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-1070. View

2.
Vlachopoulos D, Barker A, Williams C, Arngrimsson S, Knapp K, Metcalf B . The Impact of Sport Participation on Bone Mass and Geometry in Male Adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 49(2):317-326. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001091. View

3.
Schoenau E, Frost H . The "muscle-bone unit" in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002; 70(5):405-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-001-0048-8. View

4.
Gomez-Bruton A, Gonzalez-Aguero A, Gomez-Cabello A, Matute-Llorente A, Casajus J, Vicente-Rodriguez G . Swimming and bone: Is low bone mass due to hypogravity alone or does other physical activity influence it?. Osteoporos Int. 2015; 27(5):1785-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3448-8. View

5.
Schoenau E . From mechanostat theory to development of the "Functional Muscle-Bone-Unit". J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005; 5(3):232-8. View