» Articles » PMID: 30443263

A Systematic Review of Wellbeing in Children: a Comparison of Military and Civilian Families

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Nov 17
PMID 30443263
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Children in military families have uniquely different childhood experiences compared to their civilian peers, including a parent in employment and a stable familial income, frequent relocations, indirect exposure to and awareness of conflict, and extended separation from parents or siblings due to deployment. However, whether children from military families have poorer wellbeing than non-military connected children is not well understood.

Method: We conducted a systematic review to explore the relationship between military family membership (e.g. parent or sibling in the military) and child wellbeing compared to non-military connected controls. Searches for this review were conducted in September 2016 and then updated in February 2018.

Results: Nine studies were identified, eight were cross-sectional. All studies utilised self-report measures administered in US school settings. On the whole, military connected youth were not found to have poorer wellbeing than civilian children, although those with deployed parents and older military connected children were at greater risk of some adjustment difficulties (e.g. substance use, externalising behaviour). Although only assessed in two studies, having a sibling in the military and experiencing sibling deployment was statistically significantly associated with substance use and depressive symptoms.

Conclusions: This study is unique in its direct comparison of military and non-military connected youth. Our results highlight the need to examine the impact of military service in siblings and other close relatives on child wellbeing. Given the adverse impact of poor mental health on child functioning, additional research is needed ensure appropriate, evidence-based interventions are available for youth in military families.

Citing Articles

Codesign and development of a primary school based pathway for child anxiety screening and intervention delivery: a protocol, mixed-methods feasibility study.

Williamson V, Larkin M, Reardon T, Pearcey S, Hill C, Stallard P BMJ Open. 2021; 11(4):e044852.

PMID: 33879487 PMC: 8061838. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044852.

References
1.
Mayberry M, Espelage D, Koenig B . Multilevel modeling of direct effects and interactions of peers, parents, school, and community influences on adolescent substance use. J Youth Adolesc. 2009; 38(8):1038-49. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-009-9425-9. View

2.
Lara-Cinisomo S, Chandra A, Burns R, Jaycox L, Tanielian T, Ruder T . A mixed-method approach to understanding the experiences of non-deployed military caregivers. Matern Child Health J. 2011; 16(2):374-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0772-2. View

3.
Cederbaum J, Gilreath T, Benbenishty R, Astor R, Pineda D, DePedro K . Well-being and suicidal ideation of secondary school students from military families. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 54(6):672-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.006. View

4.
Jensen P, Martin D, Watanabe H . Children's response to parental separation during operation desert storm. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996; 35(4):433-41. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199604000-00009. View

5.
Sullivan K, Capp G, Gilreath T, Benbenishty R, Roziner I, Astor R . Substance Abuse and Other Adverse Outcomes for Military-Connected Youth in California: Results From a Large-Scale Normative Population Survey. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(10):922-8. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1413. View