» Articles » PMID: 30439999

Can Repeated in Vivo Micro-CT Irradiation During Adolescence Alter Bone Microstructure, Histomorphometry and Longitudinal Growth in a Rodent Model?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Nov 16
PMID 30439999
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) can monitor longitudinal changes in bone mass and microstructure in small rodents but imposing high doses of radiation can damage the bone tissue. However, the effect of weekly micro-CT scanning during the adolescence on bone growth and architecture is still unknown. The right proximal tibia of male Sprague-Dawley rats randomized into three dose groups of 0.83, 1.65 and 2.47 Gy (n = 11/group) were CT scanned at weekly intervals from 4th to 12th week of age. The left tibia was used as a control and scanned only at the last time point. Bone marrow cells were investigated, bone growth rates and histomorphometric analyses were performed, and bone structural parameters were determined for both left and right tibiae. Radiation doses of 1.65 and 2.47 Gy affected bone marrow cells, heights of the proliferative and hypertrophic zones, and bone growth rates in the irradiated tibiae. For the 1.65 Gy group, irradiated tibiae resulted in lower BMD, Tb.Th, Tb.N and a higher Tb.Sp compared with the control tibiae. A decrease in BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N and an increase in Tb.Sp were observed between the irradiated and control tibiae for the 2.47 Gy group. For cortical bone parameters, no effects were noticed for 1.65 and 0.83 Gy groups, but a lower Ct.Th was observed for 2.47 Gy group. Tibial bone development was adversely impacted and trabecular bone, together with bone marrow cells, were negatively affected by the 1.65 and 2.47 Gy radiation doses. Cortical bone microstructure was affected for 2.47 Gy group. However, bone development and morphometry were not affected for 0.83 Gy group. These findings can be used as a proof of concept for using the reasonable high-quality image acquisition under 0.83 Gy radiation doses during the adolescent period of rats without interfering with the bone development process.

Citing Articles

Refining the mandibular osteoradionecrosis rat model by in vivo longitudinal µCT analysis.

Dos Santos M, Demarquay C, Ermeneux L, Aberkane F, Blery P, Weiss P Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22241.

PMID: 34782666 PMC: 8594779. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01229-y.


Sex-dependent effects of forced exercise in the body composition of adolescent rats.

Kutsenko Y, Barreda A, Toval A, Garrigos D, Martinez-Morga M, Ribeiro Do Couto B Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10154.

PMID: 33980961 PMC: 8115159. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89584-8.


Effects of long-term in vivo micro-CT imaging on hallmarks of osteopenia and frailty in aging mice.

Scheuren A, Kuhn G, Muller R PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239534.

PMID: 32966306 PMC: 7511008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239534.


Isolated Cyclic Loading During Adolescence Improves Tibial Bone Microstructure and Strength at Adulthood.

Mustafy T, Londono I, Moldovan F, Villemure I JBMR Plus. 2020; 4(4):e10349.

PMID: 32258967 PMC: 7117850. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10349.


Radiation-induced changes to bone composition extend beyond periosteal bone.

Mandair G, Oest M, Mann K, Morris M, Damron T, Kohn D Bone Rep. 2020; 12:100262.

PMID: 32258252 PMC: 7125315. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100262.


References
1.
Lee J, Lee H, Yang M, Moon C, Kim J, Jo S . Establishment of a murine model for radiation-induced bone loss using micro-computed tomography in adult C3H/HeN mice. Lab Anim Res. 2013; 29(1):55-62. PMC: 3616210. DOI: 10.5625/lar.2013.29.1.55. View

2.
Bagi C, Ammann P, Rizzoli R, Miller S . Effect of estrogen deficiency on cancellous and cortical bone structure and strength of the femoral neck in rats. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997; 61(4):336-44. DOI: 10.1007/s002239900344. View

3.
Jacobsson M, Kalebo P, Tjellstrom A, Turesson I . Bone cell viability after irradiation. An enzyme histochemical study. Acta Oncol. 1987; 26(6):463-5. DOI: 10.3109/02841868709113719. View

4.
Compston J . Age-related changes in bone remodelling and structure in men: histomorphometric studies. J Osteoporos. 2011; 2011:108324. PMC: 3206334. DOI: 10.4061/2011/108324. View

5.
Valteau B, Grimard G, Londono I, Moldovan F, Villemure I . In vivo dynamic bone growth modulation is less detrimental but as effective as static growth modulation. Bone. 2011; 49(5):996-1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.008. View