» Articles » PMID: 30428876

Vaccine Hesitancy Among Mobile Pastoralists in Chad: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Nov 16
PMID 30428876
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Demand side barriers to vaccination among rural and hard-to-reach populations in Chad are not yet well understood. Although innovative approaches such as linking human and animal vaccination increase vaccination uptake among mobile pastoralist communities, vaccination coverage in these communities is still lower than for rural settled populations. We hypothesize that mobile pastoralists' communities in Chad face specific demand side barriers to access vaccination services. Understanding the factors that caregivers in these communities consider, explicitly or implicitly, in order to decide whether or not to vaccinate a child, in addition to understanding the provider's perspectives, are essential elements to tailor vaccination programmes towards increasing vaccination acceptance and uptake.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in a rural health district in southern Chad in April 2016 with 12 key informant in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions (FGDs) including 35 male and female participants. Participants in the study included caregivers, traditional chiefs, local and religious leaders from mobile pastoralist communities, and health officials and staff. We conducted a content analysis using a pre-defined set of categories for vaccine hesitancy covering issues on harmful effects of vaccination, mistrust with vaccination programmes/services, issues with the health system and other issues.

Results: The groups of demand side barriers reported most frequently in focus group discussions were mistrust on the expanded programme on immunization (EPI) and polio vaccination outreach services (53%, n = 94), followed by health system issues (34%, n = 94), and concerns related to potential harm of vaccines (13%, n = 94). Concerns identified by caregivers, health professionals and community leaders followed a similar pattern with issues on programme mistrust being most frequently reported and issues with harm least frequently reported. None of the health professionals reported concerns about vaccinations being potentially harmful.

Conclusion: Mobile pastoralist communities face specific demand side barriers to vaccination. Understanding these barriers is essential to reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccination uptake. Local health systems must plan for the periodic presence of pastoralist communities in their zones of responsibility and create more mutual trust.

Citing Articles

The socioeconomic impacts of Rift Valley fever: A rapid review.

ONeill L, Gubbins S, Reynolds C, Limon G, Giorgakoudi K PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(8):e0012347.

PMID: 39207938 PMC: 11361445. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012347.


COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Latin America and Africa: a scoping review.

Goncalves B, Matos C, Ferreira J, Itagyba R, Moco V, Couto M Cad Saude Publica. 2023; 39(8):e00041423.

PMID: 37556613 PMC: 10494688. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT041423.


"It is difficult for us to treat their pain". Health professionals' perceptions of Somali pastoralists in the context of pain management: a conceptual model.

Baum E, Abdi S, van Eeuwijk P, Probst-Hensch N, Zinsstag J, Tschopp R Med Humanit. 2023; 49(4):700-712.

PMID: 37468237 PMC: 10803968. DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012570.


A Systematic Review of Factors That Influence Parents' Views and Practices around Routine Childhood Vaccination in Africa: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.

Mavundza E, Cooper S, Wiysonge C Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36992146 PMC: 10058347. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030563.


COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in N'Djamena, Chad: A cross-sectional study of patients, community members, and healthcare workers.

Rice D, Balamo A, Thierry A, Gueral A, Fidele D, Mateen F PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(6):e0000608.

PMID: 36962369 PMC: 10022375. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000608.


References
1.
Hosseinpoor A, Bergen N, Schlotheuber A, Gacic-Dobo M, Hansen P, Senouci K . State of inequality in diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunisation coverage in low-income and middle-income countries: a multicountry study of household health surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4(9):e617-26. PMC: 4985563. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30141-3. View

2.
Obregon R, Waisbord S . The complexity of social mobilization in health communication: top-down and bottom-up experiences in polio eradication. J Health Commun. 2010; 15 Suppl 1:25-47. DOI: 10.1080/10810731003695367. View

3.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View

4.
Brown K, Kroll J, Hudson M, Ramsay M, Green J, Long S . Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2010; 28(26):4235-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.052. View

5.
Belmaker I, Dukhan L, Elgrici M, Yosef Y, Shahar-Rotberg L . Reduction of vaccine-preventable communicable diseases in a Bedouin population: summary of a community-based intervention programme. Lancet. 2006; 367(9515):987-91. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68425-0. View