» Articles » PMID: 30428070

Methods for Estimating Demography and Detecting Between-Locus Differences in the Effective Population Size and Mutation Rate

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Nov 15
PMID 30428070
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is known that the effective population size (Ne) and the mutation rate (u) vary across the genome. Here, we show that ignoring this heterogeneity may lead to biased estimates of past demography. To solve the problem, we develop new methods for jointly inferring past changes in population size and detecting variation in Ne and u between loci. These methods rely on either polymorphism data alone or both polymorphism and divergence data. In addition to inferring demography, we can use the methods to study a variety of questions: 1) comparing sex chromosomes with autosomes (for finding evidence for male-driven evolution, an unequal sex ratio, or sex-biased demographic changes) and 2) analyzing multilocus data from within autosomes or sex chromosomes (for studying determinants of variability in Ne and u). Simulations suggest that the methods can provide accurate parameter estimates and have substantial statistical power for detecting difference in Ne and u. As an example, we use the methods to analyze a polymorphism data set from Drosophila simulans. We find clear evidence for rapid population expansion. The results also indicate that the autosomes have a higher mutation rate than the X chromosome and that the sex ratio is probably female-biased. The new methods have been implemented in a user-friendly package.

Citing Articles

Characterization and distribution of de novo mutations in the zebra finch.

Liang X, Yang S, Wang D, Knief U Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1243.

PMID: 39358581 PMC: 11447093. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06945-5.


Screening of Genes Related to Sex Determination and Differentiation in Mandarin Fish ().

Yang C, Chen L, Huang R, Gui B, Li Y, Li Y Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(14).

PMID: 35887035 PMC: 9321114. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147692.


The estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium are virtually unaffected by natural selection.

Novo I, Santiago E, Caballero A PLoS Genet. 2022; 18(1):e1009764.

PMID: 35077457 PMC: 8815936. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009764.


Evidence for a force favoring GC over AT at short intronic sites in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.

Jackson B, Charlesworth B G3 (Bethesda). 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34544137 PMC: 8496279. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab240.


The germline mutational process in rhesus macaque and its implications for phylogenetic dating.

Bergeron L, Besenbacher S, Bakker J, Zheng J, Li P, Pacheco G Gigascience. 2021; 10(5).

PMID: 33954793 PMC: 8099771. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab029.


References
1.
Wolf J, Ellegren H . Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 18(2):87-100. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.133. View

2.
Charlesworth B . Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(3):195-205. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2526. View

3.
Cruickshank T, Hahn M . Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Mol Ecol. 2014; 23(13):3133-57. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12796. View

4.
Schrider D, Shanku A, Kern A . Effects of Linked Selective Sweeps on Demographic Inference and Model Selection. Genetics. 2016; 204(3):1207-1223. PMC: 5105852. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.190223. View

5.
Smith T, Arndt P, Eyre-Walker A . Large scale variation in the rate of germ-line de novo mutation, base composition, divergence and diversity in humans. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14(3):e1007254. PMC: 5891062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007254. View