» Articles » PMID: 30427937

How Relationship Status and Sociosexual Orientation Influence the Link Between Facial Attractiveness and Visual Attention

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Nov 15
PMID 30427937
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial attractiveness captures and binds visual attention, thus affecting visual exploration of our environment. It is often argued that this effect on attention has evolutionary functions related to mating. Although plausible, such perspectives have been challenged by recent behavioral and eye-tracking studies, which have shown that the effect on attention is moderated by various sex- and goal-related variables such as sexual orientation. In the present study, we examined how relationship status and sociosexual orientation moderate the link between attractiveness and visual attention. We hypothesized that attractiveness leads to longer looks and that being single as well as being more sociosexually unrestricted, enhances the effect of attractiveness. Using an eye-tracking free-viewing paradigm, we tested 150 heterosexual men and women looking at images of urban real-world scenes depicting two people differing in facial attractiveness. Participants additionally provided attractiveness ratings of all stimuli. We analyzed the correlations between how long faces were looked at and participants' ratings of attractiveness and found that more attractive faces-especially of the other sex-were looked at longer. We also found that more sociosexually unrestricted participants who were single had the highest attractiveness-attention correlation. Our results show that evolutionary predictions cannot fully explain the attractiveness-attention correlation; perceiver characteristics and motives moderate this relationship.

Citing Articles

Possible Differences in Visual Attention to Faces in the Context of Mate Choice and Competition.

Patkova Z, Grygarova D, Adamek P, Trebicka Fialova J, Havlicek J, Trebicky V Arch Sex Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 40000543 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-025-03086-6.


Do you look longer at attractive faces? It depends on what you are looking for.

Kerzel D, Prigoda N, Renaud O Iperception. 2024; 15(5):20416695241286413.

PMID: 39421799 PMC: 11483818. DOI: 10.1177/20416695241286413.


The role of attention in the effect of facial attractiveness on time perception.

Wu W, Tian Y Psych J. 2024; 13(3):387-397.

PMID: 38530875 PMC: 11169759. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.744.


Sharing and Receiving Eye-Contact Predicts Mate Choice After a 5-Minute Conversation: Evidence from a Speed-Dating Study.

Hoffmann A, Schiestl S, Sinske P, Gondan M, Sachse P, Maran T Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 53(3):959-968.

PMID: 38379110 PMC: 10920202. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02806-0.


Let's put a smile on that face-A positive facial expression improves aesthetics of portrait photographs.

Valuch C, Pelowski M, Peltoketo V, Hakala J, Leder H R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(10):230413.

PMID: 37885994 PMC: 10598417. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230413.


References
1.
Karremans J, Verwijmeren T . Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: the role of romantic relationship status. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008; 34(7):939-50. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208316693. View

2.
Vasquez-Amezquita M, Leongomez J, Seto M, Bonilla M, Rodriguez-Padilla A, Salvador A . Visual Attention Patterns Differ in Gynephilic and Androphilic Men and Women Depending on Age and Gender of Targets. J Sex Res. 2017; 56(1):85-101. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1372353. View

3.
Maner J, Kenrick D, Becker D, Delton A, Hofer B, Wilbur C . Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(6):1107-20. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107. View

4.
Weeden J, Sabini J . Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students. Arch Sex Behav. 2006; 36(1):79-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x. View

5.
Rammsayer T, Troche S . The relationship between sociosexuality and aspects of body image in men and women: a structural equation modeling approach. Arch Sex Behav. 2013; 42(7):1173-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-013-0114-0. View