» Articles » PMID: 30425170

Double Dissociation of Single-interval and Rhythmic Temporal Prediction in Cerebellar Degeneration and Parkinson's Disease

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Nov 15
PMID 30425170
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Predicting the timing of upcoming events is critical for successful interaction in a dynamic world, and is recognized as a key computation for attentional orienting. Temporal predictions can be formed when recent events define a rhythmic structure, as well as in aperiodic streams or even in isolation, when a specified interval is known from previous exposure. However, whether predictions in these two contexts are mediated by a common mechanism, or by distinct, context-dependent mechanisms, is highly controversial. Moreover, although the basal ganglia and cerebellum have been linked to temporal processing, the role of these subcortical structures in temporal orienting of attention is unclear. To address these issues, we tested individuals with cerebellar degeneration or Parkinson's disease, with the latter serving as a model of basal ganglia dysfunction, on temporal prediction tasks in the subsecond range. The participants performed a visual detection task in which the onset of the target was predictable, based on either a rhythmic stream of stimuli, or a single interval, specified by two events that occurred within an aperiodic stream. Patients with cerebellar degeneration showed no benefit from single-interval cuing but preserved benefit from rhythm cuing, whereas patients with Parkinson's disease showed no benefit from rhythm cuing but preserved benefit from single-interval cuing. This double dissociation provides causal evidence for functionally nonoverlapping mechanisms of rhythm- and interval-based temporal prediction for attentional orienting, and establishes the separable contributions of the cerebellum and basal ganglia to these functions, suggesting a mechanistic specialization across timing domains.

Citing Articles

Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients.

Antonioni A, Raho E, Capizzi M, Gozzi A, Antenucci P, Casadei E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4948.

PMID: 39929966 PMC: 11811137. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89311-7.


No significant relationship found between spontaneous motor tempo, heartbeat, and individual alpha frequency: an analysis of internal tempos.

Harada T, Mioni G, Cellini N, Yotsumoto Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2310.

PMID: 39824839 PMC: 11742397. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83338-y.


Beat-based dancing to music has evolutionary foundations in advanced vocal learning.

Patel A BMC Neurosci. 2024; 25(1):65.

PMID: 39506663 PMC: 11539772. DOI: 10.1186/s12868-024-00843-6.


Changes of upper-limb kinematics during practice of a redundant motor task in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Park S, Oh J, Shin M, Lee J, Lee K, Ryu J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26958.

PMID: 39505955 PMC: 11542016. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76015-7.


Dynamical mechanisms of how an RNN keeps a beat, uncovered with a low-dimensional reduced model.

Zemlianova K, Bose A, Rinzel J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26388.

PMID: 39488649 PMC: 11531529. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77849-x.


References
1.
Grahn J, Brett M . Impairment of beat-based rhythm discrimination in Parkinson's disease. Cortex. 2008; 45(1):54-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.01.005. View

2.
Schroeder C, Lakatos P . Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci. 2008; 32(1):9-18. PMC: 2990947. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.012. View

3.
Breska A, Deouell L . Automatic bias of temporal expectations following temporally regular input independently of high-level temporal expectation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014; 26(7):1555-71. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00564. View

4.
Henry M, Obleser J . Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(49):20095-100. PMC: 3523826. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213390109. View

5.
Sanabria D, Capizzi M, Correa A . Rhythms that speed you up. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 37(1):236-44. DOI: 10.1037/a0019956. View