» Articles » PMID: 30423584

No Survival Benefit in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Extended Hemodialysis Treatment Time

Overview
Journal Am J Nephrol
Publisher Karger
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2018 Nov 14
PMID 30423584
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The population of elderly end-stage renal disease patients initiating dialysis is rapidly growing. Although longer treatment is supposed to benefit for hemodialysis (HD) patients through more solute clearance and slower fluid removal, it is not yet clear how treatment session length affects mortality risk in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

Methods: In a cohort of 112,026 incident HD patients between 2007 and 2011, we examined the association of treatment session length with all-cause mortality, adjusting for demographics and comorbid conditions. We also used restricted spline functions for age to evaluate continuous changes in the association of short (< 210 min) and extended (≥240 min) HD treatment (vs. 210 to < 240 min) with all-cause mortality over continuous age.

Results: During the first 91 days of dialysis, patients aged ≥80 years tended to have the lowest treatment session length (median [interquartile range] 211 [193-230] min, r > 0.5). Longer treatment was associated with better survival in patients < 65 and 65 to < 80 years but not in octogenarians/nonagenarians. The association of extended treatment (≥240 min) with better survival was attenuated across age and not significant among patients aged ≥80 years with a hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.20). Shorter treatment sessions (< 210 min) was associated with higher mortality across all age groups.

Conclusion: Extended HD was not associated with lower mortality among octogenarians and nonagenarians, while it was associated with better survival among younger patients. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment session length in elderly incident HD patients.

Citing Articles

Nutritional and Dietary Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Under Conservative and Preservative Kidney Care Without Dialysis.

Rhee C, Yee-Moon Wang A, Biruete A, Kistler B, Kovesdy C, Zarantonello D J Ren Nutr. 2023; 33(6S):S56-S66.

PMID: 37394104 PMC: 10756934. DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2023.06.010.


: achievement, predictors and relationship to mortality in hemodialysis patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: results from DOPPS (2012-18).

AlSahow A, Muenz D, Al-Ghonaim M, Al Salmi I, Hassan M, Al Aradi A Clin Kidney J. 2021; 14(3):820-830.

PMID: 33777365 PMC: 7986324. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz195.


Comparison of dialysis dose through real-time Kt/V by ultraviolet absorbance of spent dialysate, single-pool Daugirdas II, and Kt/BSA according to sex and age.

Marrocos M, Castro C, Barbosa W, Sizo A, Rodrigues F, Lima R J Bras Nefrol. 2020; 43(1):52-60.

PMID: 33316025 PMC: 8061950. DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2020-0081.

References
1.
Eknoyan G, Beck G, Cheung A, Daugirdas J, Greene T, Kusek J . Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(25):2010-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021583. View

2.
Assimon M, Wenger J, Wang L, Flythe J . Ultrafiltration Rate and Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 68(6):911-922. PMC: 5123913. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.06.020. View

3.
Chazot C, Farrington K, Nistor I, Van Biesen W, Joosten H, Teta D . Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015; 47(11):1809-16. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-015-1107-9. View

4.
Marshall M, Polkinghorne K, Kerr P, Hawley C, Agar J, McDonald S . Intensive Hemodialysis and Mortality Risk in Australian and New Zealand Populations. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 67(4):617-28. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.025. View

5.
Miller J, Kovesdy C, Nissenson A, Mehrotra R, Streja E, Van Wyck D . Association of hemodialysis treatment time and dose with mortality and the role of race and sex. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 55(1):100-12. PMC: 2803335. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.08.007. View